Potential was me being nice. The moment he disbanded the EPRDF and formalized the PP as a single political entity, he more or less chose to continue the TPLF's autocratic grip. It would be disingenuous to equate the recent election to any of Ethiopia's previous one-party elections, but there is only a marginal difference in outcome when Abiy walks away with 410 of the 421 seats available. Widespread electoral misconduct, allegations of repression, widespread ethnic tension, violent outbursts and somehow a single political party has managed to absolute dominate the political plain. Something magic about that 97 number.
Yes, the TPLF is a foreign-sponsored agent that turned Ethiopia in the largest American client state on the continent, but the political framework they established is good. As a Tigrayan minority they rightfully recognized Ethiopia as a multinational state. Ethnic federalism is not ideal, but was not manifested out of thin air. It was created to accustom Ethiopia's inherent demographic problem. It is (theoretically anyway) a bulwark against the outright tyranny of the masses. All groups should be respected as citizens, but we cannot ignore the cultural and linguistic differences as was done by previous centralized rule. A homogenized view of 'Ethiopian' is inherently problematic.
None of this means I think the TPLF is good by any definition, nor do I think Abiy is inherently bad. Still, decentralized vs centralized.
To me the very notion of the EPRDF was the problem. Ethnic based politics is a poison chalice and in the end it hasn’t gotten Ethiopia any closer to creating a more equitable society. Which is why it’s funny that you say the framework they implemented was good. It was good for an exclusive group of petit bourgeois Tigrayan but beyond that how much better has the lives of Tigrayans gotten under the TPLF’s model? At best, their model began the conversation of inclusion but then again you can say they swagger jacked a lot of what the Derg was doing so we’re basically giving them extra credit because they’re West friendly. In the end their platform was also used with incredible ill intent and simply traded one tyranny for another.
Abiy’s aims might be autocratic. For now this is speculative. I’m not a fan of his neoliberal tendencies so I’m not exactly a partisan of his. Moreover, I think his platform draws criticism and suspicion because it leans too much on a very shallow interpretation of Ethiopia. Our history goes back much further than Axum but if that’s the starting point then that’s part of the problem. That Axumcentric slant feeds into the idea of Highlander cultural hegemony which needs to end. Ethiopia is all of these groups and so much more and a political and cultural philosophy that speaks to that is important.
As far as I’m concerned, you can have a balanced political system without the centralized vs decentralized. States based on region instead of ethnicity which affords that region a certain level of autonomy much like here in America. You can still have a strong federal government with states rights. You can have a society where citizenship doesn’t have to mean a homogenous identity. Whether or not the so called intellectuals and politicos decide that this is a worthwhile venture is another story. As of this date, most of them still revert to the same tired old feudal mentality while simultaneously claiming to despise it.