That's still a bad example of a mythical matchup. Floyd ending his career at 147 while Hearns started at 147. Hearns spent damn near 18 years on the back end of his career fighting at 154 and above.....as high as light heavy and cruiserweight. Hearns is too big too. Those guys names should be in the convo with RJJ, B Hop, and the Toney's of the world....not Floyd.
Honestly would Hagler or Hearns have gave Floyd that work?
- Thread starter Truth200
- Start date
That's still a bad example of a mythical matchup. Floyd ending his career at 147 while Hearns started at 147. Hearns spent damn near 18 years on the back end of his career fighting at 154 and above.....as high as light heavy and cruiserweight. Hearns is too big too. Those guys names should be in the convo with RJJ, B Hop, and the Toney's of the world....not Floyd.
Bomberman
Like a C4.
With his boxing skills/counterpunching to find an opening.
Jesus Is Lord
Give Thanks, Repent, and Forgive
Interesting. Talk to me breh.
@ a blown a Lightweight that has a 20% KO ratio at Welterweight and above having the ability to 'hurt' Tommy Hearns. 
He "has an 0 and aint afraid to let it go" is his catch phrase...and I believe him. I think he will one day lose, because of his willingness to fight the best out there, but it won't matter. Kinda like Canelo's loss doesnt really matter in his career, because it was to Floyd.
Thatrogueassdiaz
We're on the blood path now
Not going to take the Hagler comparison seriously. As for Hearns, if it was PBF fighting him and they're both at their primes, then I think its even
NZA
LOL
hearns is just too tall for floyd
Casual Boxing Fan Test breh....if he doesn't know those fighters, then I'm not gonna waste time arguing Boxing with him
Easy way to weed out those who don't really follow the sport
Breh,
Just for remembering that picture as the go to casual boxing fan quiz.
King P
Legends Never Die
If Thurman fought Floyd in September, he'd most likely lose.
:lethallisp:
Like I said, it really depends on who they're matched up with
hearns won the light heavyweight title
it shows you most people don't know shyt about boxing and just talk out of their ask
if they all fought in the same era, only person Floyd probably would've fought was Roberto Duran and he would've did him like Leonard did in the rematch
once again you prove you absolutely have no clue what you talking about and don't bother to even study the history of boxing
Tommy Hearns was 23 years old when he lost his WW title to Ray Leonard his last stint at Welterweight, Floyd was 23 fighting Diego Corrales at Super Featherweight, how does this match up in your mind
Hearns won the Light Middle weight title the next year and constantly moved up in weight
they were never the same size at all, and welterweight isn't Hearn's best weight at all
Floyd can't even make 154, you are matching up against someone who WON the light heavyweight title
King P
Legends Never Die
Oh look, it's this fukking moron again. Miss me with all that shyt, I know about both of their careers.
Please, point me to where I said they were the same size or that it was Hearns best weight? Oh you can,'t so shut the fukk up.
Point is they were both in the same division, so it's fair to put them against each other. You nikkas just mad because you know Floyd would take an L and that thought of that just makes you sick.
If we put Thomas Hearns against Pernell Whitaker or Oscar De La Hoya damn near any boxer that was at WW you could say "oh, but he's too big!". But you know you wouldn't.
I guess it's unfair to match up Chris Byrd or Michael Spinks against Heavyweights too considering how much smaller they are compared to the big Heavyweights
Shut the fukk up, and get out your feelings bytch nikka
