Honestly would Hagler or Hearns have gave Floyd that work?

[Master Teacher]

Oh look, it's this fukking moron again. Miss me with all that shyt, I know about both of their careers.

Please, point me to where I said they were the same size or that it was Hearns best weight? Oh you can,'t so shut the fukk up.

Point is they were both in the same division, so it's fair to put them against each other. You nikkas just mad because you know Floyd would take an L and that thought of that just makes you sick.

If we put Thomas Hearns against Pernell Whitaker or Oscar De La Hoya damn near any boxer that was at WW you could say "oh, but he's too big!". But you know you wouldn't.

I guess it's unfair to match up Chris Byrd or Michael Spinks against Heavyweights too considering how much smaller they are compared to the big Heavyweights

Shut the fukk up, and get out your feelings bytch nikka

First Thomas Hearns doesn't have one victory against an all time great at Welterweight
his best wins are against Benitez and Duran, at 154, these are facts, two smaller men at that

If he couldn't knock out Benitez, who was a natural jr weletrweight what makes you think his power would be too much for Floyd

but that's not the point, the point is if they were in the same era, they never would've fought

Hearns v.s. Whitaker, and De La Hoya, lol WHO SAYS THIS

Only idiots like you bring up match ups that would make no sense

The whole point is if they were in the same era, they would've never fought each other, period

Hearns spent the first 3 years of his career at welterweight, THAT'S IT

Now you are mad and back tracking, because you don't have any knowledge o the sport

you ever watched tommy hearns except on highlights, you know absolutely nothing about his career

 

[King P]

First Thomas Hearns doesn't have one victory against an all time great at Welterweight
his best wins are against Benitez and Duran, at 154, these are facts, two smaller men at that

If he couldn't knock out Benitez, who was a natural jr weletrweight what makes you think his power would be too much for Floyd

but that's not the point, the point is if they were in the same era, they never would've fought

Hearns v.s. Whitaker, and De La Hoya, lol WHO SAYS THIS

Only idiots like you bring up match ups that would make no sense

The whole point is if they were in the same era, they would've never fought each other, period

Hearns spent the first 3 years of his career at welterweight, THAT'S IT

Now you are mad and back tracking, because you don't have any knowledge o the sport

you ever watched tommy hearns except on highlights, you know absolutely nothing about his career

"If he couldn't knock out Benitez" You say that like Benitez isn't one of the greatest defensive fighters of all time, plus had a chin to boot

Benitez and Duran were smaller, but they could still make the division, so they could still fight

If you've fought at a division, it's fair to put you up against somebody else who has been in the division. Stop bytching and moaning. I also find it funny how you say this, but yet you had no problem when it comes to somebody you feel Floyd could beat. Somebody like uhh... Tito Trinidad

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/prim...e-felix-tito-trinidad-at-147-who-wins.221473/

Floyd has fought better competition than tito throughout their careers

I don't think tito would beat cotto either

You do know Tito is way bigger than Floyd right? And they wouldn't have ever fought if they were in the same era right? So that matchup wouldn't have made any sense. Yet you ain't say shyt then

 

[Master Teacher]

"If he couldn't knock out Benitez" You say that like Benitez isn't one of the greatest defensive fighters of all time, plus had a chin to boot

Benitez and Duran were smaller, but they could still make the division, so they could still fight

If you've fought at a division, it's fair to put you up against somebody else who has been in the division. Stop bytching and moaning. I also find it funny how you say this, but yet you had no problem when it comes to somebody you feel Floyd could beat. Somebody like uhh... Tito Trinidad

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/prim...e-felix-tito-trinidad-at-147-who-wins.221473/



You do know Tito is way bigger than Floyd right? And they wouldn't have ever fought if they were in the same era right? So that matchup wouldn't have made any sense. Yet you ain't say shyt then

Jesus christ you are a moron

instead of coming with facts, you come with your biased worthless opinion without anything to stand

benitez was one of the best defensive fighters correct, but FLOYD IS THE BEST, and Benitez started as a 140 pounder, Floyd started at 130 and didn't make 154 until he was in 30's, benitez was washed up by the time he was 32, you don't know shyt about boxing, and it was an MD win for Hearns, so to think he would just steam roll Floyd is just fukking ridiculous when Floyd does everything benitez does only better

So if they were in the same era when would he ever fight Hearns, you fukking moron, and why change the subject

your ignorant ass believed Tommy Hearns was a Welterweight the majority of his career, when he wasn't

LMAO

Tito is way bigger than Floyd, IN WHAT REALITY

Duran actually fought at super middleweight, he's not the same size of Floyd, because if they were in the same era they would've crossed paths at 135 or 147 easily that's why I said they would've fought and that's a match up to discuss

Everybody knows Hopkins vs Tito and De La Hoya were mismatches because of the size difference

Tito was a small middleweight like Cotto, he was never, his middleweight title victory was like Hearns Light Heayvweight victory, ONE AND DONE

Hearns ended his career ranked at CRUISERWEIGHT, you don't know shyt

The whole reason why people bring up hearns and hagler is because they think they are welterweights, or think welterweights were better back then when they were not

Floyd would have a huge advantage against hearns at welterweight, because he was extremely frail as a welterweight and a gus wind could fold this nikka

Hearns had one big fight at welterweight against Leonard and lost, he tied leonard at SUPER MIDDLEWEIGHT, so he was obviously better at that weight

just admit you have no clue what you speak on and bounce

 

[King P]

Jesus christ you are a moron

instead of coming with facts, you come with your biased worthless opinion without anything to stand

You of all people are talking about somebody having a biased worthless opinion? Oh the irony Lemme dismantle your post real quick.

benitez was one of the best defensive fighters correct, but FLOYD IS THE BEST, and Benitez started as a 140 pounder, Floyd started at 130 and didn't make 154 until he was in 30's, benitez was washed up by the time he was 32, you don't know shyt about boxing, and it was an MD win for Hearns, so to think he would just steam roll Floyd is just fukking ridiculous when Floyd does everything benitez does only better

And you have the nerve to say I don't know shyt 1st off, I knew where both of them started, so I don't know where the fukk you're going with that. And you obviously don't know shyt about Benitez. 1st off, he was washed up long before he turned 32. Try 25. Actually the Hearns fight was really the last fight in his prime. After the he was a druggie and a spent fighter. As a defensive fighter he's up there with Floyd, and even if Floyd is better it's marginal. You obviously haven't watched El Radar if you think Floyd is light years ahead of Benitez. And where the fukk did I say Hearns would steamroll through Floyd? I said he beats him every time, that doesn't mean he steamrolls him. Then again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point.

your ignorant ass believed Tommy Hearns was a Welterweight the majority of his career, when he wasn't

Where the hell did I say that? I said Hearns spent a SIGNIFICANT amount of time at Welterwight. 4 years is enough to judge somebody as a Welterweight. I never said he spend the MAJORITY of his career at Welterweight. Once again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point

Tito is way bigger than Floyd, IN WHAT REALITY

Are you fukking kidding me? You're really gonna tell me Tito isn't much bigger than Floyd Ayo @ChocolateGiddyUp this nikka thinks Tito is a small dude.

Floyd around the size of Cotto

Now look at Cotto next to Tito

If Cotto is small compared to Tito, then what does that say about Floyd?

Tito was a small middleweight like Cotto, he was never, his middleweight title victory was like Hearns Light Heayvweight victory, ONE AND DONE

Hearns ended his career ranked at CRUISERWEIGHT, you don't know shyt

And you heave the nerve to tell me I don't know shyt

Tito was not a small middleweight. I mean, look at all the Middleweight champs in 2000

That's a small Middleweight to you?

To compare Tito to Cotto shows you don't know shyt. I mean, look at Cotto next to a real Middleweight

Oh and by the way dumbass, if you're gonna tell me I don't know shyt about the career of a fighter, you should probably have your facts straight dumb nikka. Yes Hearns ended his career at Cruiser, but he was NOT a 1 and LHW champ. He won the title on 2 separate occasions, 1st was against Dennis Andries and the 2nd was against Virgil Hill

The whole reason why people bring up hearns and hagler is because they think they are welterweights, or think welterweights were better back then when they were not

Floyd would have a huge advantage against hearns at welterweight, because he was extremely frail as a welterweight and a gus wind could fold this nikka

Nobody thinks Hagler was a welterweight. And I forgot that I was talking to the guy who says this era of small ass WW is the best

Only SRL beat him, if a gust of win could fold him how come nobody else other than Leonard could

Hearns had one big fight at welterweight against Leonard and lost, he tied leonard at SUPER MIDDLEWEIGHT, so he was obviously better at that weight.

He lost because he got KOd. If you watched the fight, you'd know that he was boxing the shyt outta Leonard, before SRL pulled a comeback outta his his ass. And Leonard was washed up and wasn't as good at SMW. So your comment is based off some bullshyt.

just admit you have no clue what you speak on and bounce

I think you need to follow your own advise. You out here tryna drop knowledge and failing miserably. I guess that's why you're THE WOAT Ring poster ater all

 

[Master Teacher]

You of all people are talking about somebody having a biased worthless opinion? Oh the irony Lemme dismantle your post real quick.



And you have the nerve to say I don't know shyt 1st off, I knew where both of them started, so I don't know where the fukk you're going with that. And you obviously don't know shyt about Benitez. 1st off, he was washed up long before he turned 32. Try 25. Actually the Hearns fight was really the last fight in his prime. After the he was a druggie and a spent fighter. As a defensive fighter he's up there with Floyd, and even if Floyd is better it's marginal. You obviously haven't watched El Radar if you think Floyd is light years ahead of Benitez. And where the fukk did I say Hearns would steamroll through Floyd? I said he beats him every time, that doesn't mean he steamrolls him. Then again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point.


Where the hell did I say that? I said Hearns spent a SIGNIFICANT amount of time at Welterwight. 4 years is enough to judge somebody as a Welterweight. I never said he spend the MAJORITY of his career at Welterweight. Once again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point


Are you fukking kidding me? You're really gonna tell me Tito isn't much bigger than Floyd Ayo @ChocolateGiddyUp this nikka thinks Tito is a small dude.

Floyd around the size of Cotto

Now look at Cotto next to Tito

If Cotto is small compared to Tito, then what does that say about Floyd?



And you heave the nerve to tell me I don't know shyt

Tito was not a small middleweight. I mean, look at all the Middleweight champs in 2000

That's a small Middleweight to you?

To compare Tito to Cotto shows you don't know shyt. I mean, look at Cotto next to a real Middleweight

Oh and by the way dumbass, if you're gonna tell me I don't know shyt about the career of a fighter, you should probably have your facts straight dumb nikka. Yes Hearns ended his career at Cruiser, but he was NOT a 1 and LHW champ. He won the title on 2 separate occasions, 1st was against Dennis Andries and the 2nd was against Virgil Hill


Nobody thinks Hagler was a welterweight. And I forgot that I was talking to the guy who says this era of small ass WW is the best

Only SRL beat him, if a gust of win could fold him how come nobody else other than Leonard could


He lost because he got KOd. If you watched the fight, you'd know that he was boxing the shyt outta Leonard, before SRL pulled a comeback outta his his ass. And Leonard was washed up and wasn't as good at SMW. So your comment is based off some bullshyt.


I think you need to follow your own advise. You out here tryna drop knowledge and failing miserably. I guess that's why you're THE WOAT Ring poster ater all

You typed of bunch of nonsense that's not even readable

that picture of Tito and Cotto, Tito is old and fight

What does Height have to do with anything, Paul Williams is taller than Tito, so what

When we are talking size we are talking weight dumb ass

and Floyd has the same reach as Tito

Tito never fought at super middleweight, light heavyweight, and crusier weight

dumb ass

You said Tommy Hearns and Floyd spend most their time at Welterweight, so it would be in talks for them to fight, and it's not true, Hearns was only a t welterweight from 1978 to 1981

Floyd has been at Welterweight since 2006, damn near ten years, it's not comparable

 

[King P]

You typed of bunch of nonsense that's not even readable

All of it is readable, it's just reading comprehension isn't your strong point

that picture of Tito and Cotto, Tito is old and fight

What does Height have to do with anything, Paul Williams is taller than Tito, so what

When we are talking size we are talking weight dumb ass

That picture was taken in 2010. What has changed since then? Tito was retired then, and still retired now. And Cotto isn't any bigger. I never mentioned anything about size dummy. If you can't see the size difference in that pic you're a bigger dummy than I thought

and Floyd has the same reach as Tito

And what the fukk does that have to do with anything? All that means is that Tito has shorter arms, doesn't mean they're anywhere near the same size

Tito never fought at super middleweight, light heavyweight, and crusier weight

dumb ass

The irony of calling anybody else a dumbass Tito did fight at Light Heavy. Against Roy Jones. And before you mention about it being a catchweight, 170 is still considered LHW. 175 is the limit. And he didn't fight at SMW because he retired after the fight with Winky Wright. He could have easily made SMW if he wanted to.

You said Tommy Hearns and Floyd spend most their time at Welterweight, so it would be in talks for them to fight, and it's not true, Hearns was only a t welterweight from 1978 to 1981

Floyd has been at Welterweight since 2006, damn near ten years, it's not comparable

Actually, Hearns started in 77, but whatever.

Please point to me where I said this? Because never did I once say that. Here, I'll even pull up my quote...

Mayweather vs Hearns is fair though because both have them of been Welterweights for a significant amount of time

Significant =/= Majority you dumb fukk. Hearns spent 4 years at WW. 4 years is a significant amount of time.

Master Pupil strikes again Ladies & Gentlemen

 

[Master Teacher]

All of it is readable, it's just reading comprehension isn't your strong point sas1:


That picture was taken in 2010. What has changed since then? Tito was retired then, and still retired now. And Cotto isn't any bigger. I never mentioned anything about size dummy. If you can't see the size difference in that pic you're a bigger dummy than I thought


And what the fukk does that have to do with anything? All that means is that Tito has shorter arms, doesn't mean they're anywhere near the same size


The irony of calling anybody else a dumbass Tito did fight at Light Heavy. Against Roy Jones. And before you mention about it being a catchweight, 170 is still considered LHW. 175 is the limit. And he didn't fight at SMW because he retired after the fight with Winky Wright. He could have easily made SMW if he wanted to.


Actually, Hearns started in 77, but whatever.

Please point to me where I said this? Because never did I once say that. Here, I'll even pull up my quote...


Significant =/= Majority you dumb fukk. Hearns spent 4 years at WW. 4 years is a significant amount of time.

Master Pupil strikes again Ladies & Gentlemen

Jesus chrsit you are fukking moron

Tito fought Roy when they both were old as fukk, you are actually counting that shyt

That's like counting Hearn's crusierweight fights at the end of his career lmao

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT

What would be Hearns and Floyd's age if they fought, you fukking moron

hearns spent 4 years at welterweight

Floyd spend 4 at super featherweight, and long behold, when would Hearns and Floyd be aligned to fight each other, by time Floyd moved up to Welterweight hearns would be a super middleweight you fukking moron

The only person out the four horsemen hearns fought at welterweight was Ray Leonard when he was 23, to fight prime Floyd at 23, he would be super featherweight

so to have them match up at welterweight hearns would need to be 23 and Floyd would be 29 years of age

do you see how fukking stupid you are

only welterweight belts in the 80's were Hearns and Leonard, and Leonard and Duran, but you dumb fakkits glamorized the fights between the four horsemen has welterweight belts when they majorty of the fights were at jr middleweight to super middleweight

Also Tito fighting Roy at a catchweight
its not comparable to Hearns being the LIght HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION

and he was also RANKED AT CRUSIERWEIGHT

Tito was never ranked above Middleweight

 

[Jesus Is Lord]

You of all people are talking about somebody having a biased worthless opinion? Oh the irony Lemme dismantle your post real quick.



And you have the nerve to say I don't know shyt 1st off, I knew where both of them started, so I don't know where the fukk you're going with that. And you obviously don't know shyt about Benitez. 1st off, he was washed up long before he turned 32. Try 25. Actually the Hearns fight was really the last fight in his prime. After the he was a druggie and a spent fighter. As a defensive fighter he's up there with Floyd, and even if Floyd is better it's marginal. You obviously haven't watched El Radar if you think Floyd is light years ahead of Benitez. And where the fukk did I say Hearns would steamroll through Floyd? I said he beats him every time, that doesn't mean he steamrolls him. Then again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point.


Where the hell did I say that? I said Hearns spent a SIGNIFICANT amount of time at Welterwight. 4 years is enough to judge somebody as a Welterweight. I never said he spend the MAJORITY of his career at Welterweight. Once again, reading comprehension isn't your strong point


Are you fukking kidding me? You're really gonna tell me Tito isn't much bigger than Floyd Ayo @ChocolateGiddyUp this nikka thinks Tito is a small dude.

Floyd around the size of Cotto

Now look at Cotto next to Tito

If Cotto is small compared to Tito, then what does that say about Floyd?



And you heave the nerve to tell me I don't know shyt

Tito was not a small middleweight. I mean, look at all the Middleweight champs in 2000

That's a small Middleweight to you?

To compare Tito to Cotto shows you don't know shyt. I mean, look at Cotto next to a real Middleweight

Oh and by the way dumbass, if you're gonna tell me I don't know shyt about the career of a fighter, you should probably have your facts straight dumb nikka. Yes Hearns ended his career at Cruiser, but he was NOT a 1 and LHW champ. He won the title on 2 separate occasions, 1st was against Dennis Andries and the 2nd was against Virgil Hill


Nobody thinks Hagler was a welterweight. And I forgot that I was talking to the guy who says this era of small ass WW is the best

Only SRL beat him, if a gust of win could fold him how come nobody else other than Leonard could


He lost because he got KOd. If you watched the fight, you'd know that he was boxing the shyt outta Leonard, before SRL pulled a comeback outta his his ass. And Leonard was washed up and wasn't as good at SMW. So your comment is based off some bullshyt.


I think you need to follow your own advise. You out here tryna drop knowledge and failing miserably. I guess that's why you're THE WOAT Ring poster ater all

 

[Jesus Is Lord]

Jesus chrsit you are fukking moron

Tito fought Roy when they both were old as fukk, you are actually counting that shyt

That's like counting Hearn's crusierweight fights at the end of his career lmao

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT

What would be Hearns and Floyd's age if they fought, you fukking moron

hearns spent 4 years at welterweight

Floyd spend 4 at super featherweight, and long behold, when would Hearns and Floyd be aligned to fight each other, by time Floyd moved up to Welterweight hearns would be a super middleweight you fukking moron

The only person out the four horsemen hearns fought at welterweight was Ray Leonard when he was 23, to fight prime Floyd at 23, he would be super featherweight

so to have them match up at welterweight hearns would need to be 23 and Floyd would be 29 years of age

do you see how fukking stupid you are

only welterweight belts in the 80's were Hearns and Leonard, and Leonard and Duran, but you dumb fakkits glamorized the fights between the four horsemen has welterweight belts when they majorty of the fights were at jr middleweight to super middleweight

Also Tito fighting Roy at a catchweight
its not comparable to Hearns being the LIght HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION

and he was also RANKED AT CRUSIERWEIGHT

Tito was never ranked above Middleweight

 

[King P]

Jesus chrsit you are fukking moron

Tito fought Roy when they both were old as fukk, you are actually counting that shyt

That's like counting Hearn's crusierweight fights at the end of his career lmao

Funny because you're counting Hearn's cruiserweight fights.

Oh, I'm sorry, pretty sure you said Tito NEVER fought at LHW. Now it's "but but but it's only 1 fight"

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT

What would be Hearns and Floyd's age if they fought, you fukking moron

hearns spent 4 years at welterweight

Floyd spend 4 at super featherweight, and long behold, when would Hearns and Floyd be aligned to fight each other, by time Floyd moved up to Welterweight hearns would be a super middleweight you fukking moron

The only person out the four horsemen hearns fought at welterweight was Ray Leonard when he was 23, to fight prime Floyd at 23, he would be super featherweight

so to have them match up at welterweight hearns would need to be 23 and Floyd would be 29 years of age

This nikka takes these fantasy fights so seriously, put down the cape gotdamn

How come you didn't take it so seriously when the Floyd vs Tito fight came up

do you see how fukking stupid you are

only welterweight belts in the 80's were Hearns and Leonard, and Leonard and Duran, but you dumb fakkits glamorized the fights between the four horsemen has welterweight belts when they majorty of the fights were at jr middleweight to super middleweight

Did they fight at WW though

Yes, then we can pit them up against ANY Welterweight that fought there. nikkas acting like we putting them up against Heavyweights, Jesus Christ get your head out your ass.

Also Tito fighting Roy at a catchweight
its not comparable to Hearns being the LIght HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION

and he was also RANKED AT CRUSIERWEIGHT

Tito was never ranked above Middleweight

Tito was never ranked above middleweight because he retired you dumbass, only coming back for the Roy fight.

Oh, and didn't you just say above

Tito fought Roy when they both were old as fukk, you are actually counting that shyt

That's like counting Hearn's crusierweight fights at the end of his career lmao

Why you counting Hearns cruiserweight stint then Is it Oochie Wally or is it One Mic

 

[Master Teacher]

Funny because you're counting Hearn's cruiserweight fights.

Oh, I'm sorry, pretty sure you said Tito NEVER fought at LHW. Now it's "but but but it's only 1 fight"


This nikka takes these fantasy fights so seriously, put down the cape gotdamn

How come you didn't take it so seriously when the Floyd vs Tito fight came up


Did they fight at WW though

Yes, then we can pit them up against ANY Welterweight that fought there. nikkas acting like we putting them up against Heavyweights, Jesus Christ get your head out your ass.

Also Tito fighting Roy at a catchweight
its not comparable to Hearns being the LIght HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION

and he was also RANKED AT CRUSIERWEIGHT

Tito was never ranked above Middleweight

Tito was never ranked above middleweight because he retired you dumbass, only coming back for the Roy fight.

Oh, and didn't you just say above



Why you counting Hearns cruiserweight stint then Is it Oochie Wally or is it One Mic [/QUOTE]

CAN YOU fukkING READ

Hearns was RANKED AT CRUISERWEIGHT, and he actually won a title at cruiserweight just not a major won

Tito was never ranked in any class above middleweight

you do know boxing has rankings right

do you understand the sport

 

[King P]

CAN YOU fukkING READ

Hearns was RANKED AT CRUISERWEIGHT, and he actually won a title at cruiserweight just not a major won

Tito was never ranked in any class above middleweight

you do know boxing has rankings right

do you understand the sport

Yes I can read, but I don't think you can. You implied above that Hearns stint doesn't mean shyt. Now all of a sudden you're bringing up his ranking and his paper title at that weight. Which one is it nikka? Does it count or does it not count

Of course Tito wasn't ranked in any class above middleweight. But like I said before (not sure you can fukking read) he retired after the fight with Winky. How's he gonna be ranked when he's not even active You think if Tito moved up to SMW and fought there a couple times that he wouldn't have been ranked either

I think you need to ask yourself if YOU understand the sport nikka. You all over the place with these comments. All because we put Mayweather vs Hearns in a fantasy matchup

Get out your feelings, dumb nikka

 

[Master Teacher]

Yes I can read, but I don't think you can. You implied above that Hearns stint doesn't mean shyt. Now all of a sudden you're bringing up his ranking and his paper title at that weight. Which one is it nikka? Does it count or does it not count

Of course Tito wasn't ranked in any class above middleweight. But like I said before (not sure you can fukking read) he retired after the fight with Winky. How's he gonna be ranked when he's not even active You think if Tito moved up to SMW and fought there a couple times that he wouldn't have been ranked either

I think you need to ask yourself if YOU understand the sport nikka. You all over the place with these comments. All because we put Mayweather vs Hearns in a fantasy matchup

Get out your feelings, dumb nikka

This why it's pointless to talk to morons like you about anything

He wasn't in his prime at crusierweight, but the fact that he was ranked, means he was actually competitive in the weight class
Tito's never been competitive above middleweight, and his fight with roy was an embarrassment for both men, unlike Tommy Hearns who was not embarrassment at cruiserweight even though he was at the end of his career

I compared his light heavyweight championship to Tito's middleweight championship, they won it and lost it right after

their best weights were below that, hearns was probably at his best at super middleweight, and of course Tito was equally as good at 147 and 154

you know exactly what I'm saying but you wanna play games like the fakkit you are

And for the record, Floyd beats Hearns at welterweight and 154, he struggled with benitez who is nowhere near floyd's level

I merely stating the fact when compare eras saying who fought who, when they were never in same class to begin with

 

[King P]

This why it's pointless to talk to morons like you about anything

He wasn't in his prime at crusierweight, but the fact that he was ranked, means he was actually competitive in the weight class
Tito's never been competitive above middleweight, and his fight with roy was an embarrassment for both men, unlike Tommy Hearns who was not embarrassment at cruiserweight even though he was at the end of his career

Hearns wasn't an embarrassment because he fought average at best fighters at Cruiser (which is a fukking deadzone division to begin with).

Being ranked doesn't mean much. There's alot of wack boxers that are ranked high. fukking Shannon Briggs is ranked 4th right now by the WBA. And he hasn't fought anybody! Chavez is ranked in the Top 5 in the SMW divisions by 2 organizations. Who the fukk has he beat at 168 to be ranked so high Beat Bryan Vera twice and just lost to Fonfora Rankings don't mean shyt

I compared his light heavyweight championship to Tito's middleweight championship, they won it and lost it right after

Yeah, but you said Hearns was 1 and done at LHW. He won the LHW title on 2 separate occasions. How can you say he was 1 and done at the division

their best weights were below that, hearns was probably at his best at super middleweight, and of course Tito was equally as good at 147 and 154

Hearns was best at 154 and 160.

And for the record, Floyd beats Hearns at welterweight and 154, he struggled with benitez who is nowhere near floyd's level

I merely stating the fact when compare eras saying who fought who, when they were never in same class to begin with

You obviously haven't watch Benitez. In his prime he was a great fighter. Mayweather ain't light years ahead of him, the difference between them in talent is marginal

@ Mayweather beating Hearns at 154. Earlier in this thread you said

Floyd can't even make 154, you are matching up against someone who WON the light heavyweight title

Floyd can't make 154, yet you have him beating arguably the greatest fighter in that division

 

[Baracka Flocka Flame]

Hagler wasn't even in the same weight class. To be honest it's even. If Hagler had to drain down to welterweight Floyd embarrasses him. Goes similar to a fight with Shane Mosley. If Floyd moved up to middleweight to fight Hagler he gets stopped in 4 or 5. That simple