Hearns wasn't an embarrassment because he fought average at best fighters at Cruiser (which is a fukking deadzone division to begin with).
Being ranked doesn't mean much. There's alot of wack boxers that are ranked high. fukking Shannon Briggs is ranked 4th right now by the WBA. And he hasn't fought anybody! Chavez is ranked in the Top 5 in the SMW divisions by 2 organizations. Who the fukk has he beat at 168 to be ranked so high Beat Bryan Vera twice and just lost to Fonfora Rankings don't mean shyt
Yeah, but you said Hearns was 1 and done at LHW. He won the LHW title on 2 separate occasions. How can you say he was 1 and done at the division
Hearns was best at 154 and 160.
You obviously haven't watch Benitez. In his prime he was a great fighter. Mayweather ain't light years ahead of him, the difference between them in talent is marginal
@ Mayweather beating Hearns at 154. Earlier in this thread you said
Floyd can't make 154, yet you have him beating arguably the greatest fighter in that division
Hearns was ranked at cruiserweight which means he was active in the weight class you moron, Tito never campaigned about middleweight
Hearns is nowhere near the greatest 154 pounder, why because he beat 140 pounder and Duran who was moving up in weight lol
being ranked doesn't mean much
IT MEANS YOU CAN FIGHT AT THAT WEIGHT LIMIT and HAVE BEEN DOING SO
Floyd can't weigh at 154 pounds its a fact, but if he fought hearns at that weight limit he would still win coming at 152, and Hearns is not the greatest 154 pound by a long shot
Benitez is nowhere near floyd period, he was in his prime when he fought hearns he was 22 years old, and Hearns barely beat him, Hearns wouldn't be able to touch Floyd period
I brought the weight to show how their career paths were never on the same track, so talking about a fight between was dumb because the same age Floyd became a welterweight hearns was on his way to 160-168, why are you so retarded