lol...Not one of you has posted a single iota of evidence. You just post these shoddy articles with no peer-reviewed study or real citations that draw absurd, laughable conclusions like Nubians built statues in Mesoamerica because the statues appear to have African features, even though the statues clearly look more like Mesoamerican natives than they do straight-nosed Nubians, even though there's zero evidence of these African sailing expeditions, no archaeological evidence or artifacts, and no linguistic, DNA or other evidence historians and anthropologists use to try and discern history.
And shut the fukk up with this cac shyt. For the millionth time, this is about facts and evidence vs. bullshyt, not ethnic allegiance. You would be calling Malcolm X and Huey Newton cacs if they were somehow ressurrected and were in this thread because they're too educated and intelligent to believe this bullshyt you gullibly swallow.
This is one of the most well-respected and significant American historians ever, John Hope Franklin.
He served on Thurgood Marshall's legal team that created the case for Brown vs. the Board of Education, and worked tirelessly his entire life to work for civil rights and equality, and capture the humanity and plight of the African diaspora in America. He was a historian par excellence, and he never espoused or believe any of this OlmecBut you would call him a c00n.
Believe it or not, some of us are actually learned and well-read and have actually researched and studied history without accidentally stumbling into it while trying to lose our virginity by listening to Tariq Nasheed. You clowns obviously have never read a book on history or anthropology in your entire lives and got your crash course in mis-education on it via Hidden Colors.
But anyway, I'm going to post this again. I know y'all don't read, but it's here if you want to actually try and educate yourself. This article completely debunks every claim in the Olmec alternative origin hypothesis using facts and logic. It's from actual, reputable scholars, who unlike Van Sertima, managed to get through peer review and be published in Current Anthropology, one of the most respected academic journals in the field. http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/vansertima.pdf
I already posted it once, and the response from some idiot here was "I didn't read it and I can tell by the title that you're a cac."
No you do not. You have a couple of nuts like Ivan Van Sertima and Clyde Winters who nobody in archaeological academia take seriously pushing this bullshyt with no evidence. There are a handful of crackpots you can count on one hand in every academic discipline. Like Peter Duesberg, for example...a biologist who claims that HIV doesn't cause the disease AIDS. 99% of anthropologists, archaeologists, and historians consider the alternative Olmec hypothesis a joke. Sorry to break it to you.
They don't exist anymore? The fukk are you talking about?
There are Mesoamerican peoples who exist today that are the direct descendents of the Olmecs who live in total population isolation, and there's been genetic studies those prove that there is no genetic markers within isolated native populations from Africans that don't come from post-colonial contact. And there's been immunological studies done on them showing they have no antibody resistance to Old World diseases, which means they never came in contact with people from the Old World.
@posting that bullshyt web page from that clown Clyde Winters who has been sonned by real scholars on youtube as many times as Wile E. Coyote got sonned by the Roadrunner. It's funny how you guys cannot produce one single peer-reviewed article from an academic journal.
Why do you think people like Van Sertima, Winters, and Welsing cannot get published in academic journals? Lemme guess, it's the grand conspiracy of cacs? Well that's stupid as fukk because one, not all of academia is white obviously, two, academia full of leftists who are more than happy to shyt on and expose the evils and lies of western civilization, and three, there are plenty of black people in the social sciences with ideas that would be deemed radical by the mainstream, but still pass peer review and get published. The buffoons y'all are dikkrding can't get published BECAUSE THE STUFF THEY SAY IS BULLshyt AND THEY CAN'T SUPPORT IT WITH EVIDENCE. Get it through your thick skulls.
You are still playing from the cac play book I see. Sites like st0rmfr0nt commonly use that same link you posted to "debunk" scholars like Van Sertima. And they STILL did not prove Van Sertima wrong LOL
Just because you post links from the same Eurocentric scholars who teach that Africans lived in mud huts ,don't expect real knowledgable Black people to fall for the banana in the tail pipe.
Please. This is my third time mentioning this but that old ass Polish dude came from Africa to America alone on a fukking canoe so how is out of the realm of possibility for Africans. Would it be better if the Ancient Africans and Olmecs friended each other on Facebook and tagged themselves in each others pics? You can disagree all day everyday but to say there is NO evidence then you are dingy ass liar.
I hope you put this much effort in school 
reading is fundamental
ok buddy
