I used the word "evidence" for a reason. I'm not speaking in absolutes. I said that there's evidence that points to the Olmecs having African ancestry and influence. This evidence is recognized by scholars who are non black, and the only reason that I point that out is because people like you won't accept anything unless it comes from a white man's mouth. the information is out there, go find it. A lot of this information can be found on the Internet as well. I stumbled across the videos of that white man. Again, he wasn't saying anything that can't be found in libraries/book stores. It's up to you to disprove or debunk the evidence that supports some of the claims of socalled "afrocentricism". The way that some of you just readily dismiss any information that contradicts what your white daddy says or has taught you, says it all.
Come on man, don't play that game. If there is evidence that you say I'm overlooking, then present it. "it's out there, go find it" is a cop out.
Even when I watched HC2 yesterday, I was disappointed because I thought they were going to get deeper into the Olmec theory, but they didn't. All they did was talk about how the head was discovered, how it looked like an African, and then that was it
......in fact the whole documentary was 2 hours worth of that kind of shyt. They run off a bunch of theories, and then say they are "documented" without presenting these documents for the viewer. How convenient.