Has Steph Curry Regressed?

Has steph curry regressed this season?

  • Yes

    Votes: 21 58.3%
  • No

    Votes: 15 41.7%

  • Total voters
    36

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,242
Reputation
5,507
Daps
105,830
Care to actually speak on the substantive issue of this post? Clearly posters on here believe there is credence to curry regression argument based on the poll alone. Thus far his stats are lower across the board and his field goal percentage is 82nd in the entire league.
fukk outta here

I cooked u in that LeBron thread and u just negged me and ran away. Don't bother me with your disingenuous nonsense :coffee:
 

Roger king

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
7,980
Reputation
-2,373
Daps
29,505
All these old guys have regressed, it's supposed to be that way. It ain't 2017 anymore...

Ready for all these dudes to go and really allow the young guys to blossom. LeBron, Paul, Durant, Westbrook, Steph, Harden, George, Kawhi, Kyrie. None of these guys are who they were 5 years ago, all of em can gracefully bow out and go home...
Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?
 

murksiderock

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2017
Messages
14,941
Reputation
6,471
Daps
46,228
Reppin
SMF and LAX to VA and NC
Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?
I think when you know what guys used to look like, the eye test gives the strongest indicator of when a guy is losing it or doesn't have it anymore...

As far as hard stats, it's different depending on the player, I guess. One of the biggest indicators of LeBron's decline is he continually falling free throw rate. He attacks the basket less and less each season and at his very best, it was one of the best weapons in his offense, no one pressured the rim as effectively as he did...

His free throw rate now is under 26%, a new career low. Another indicator, lowest ppg since his rookie year. But I think overall, the eye test tells you everything you need to know. He doesn't move the same...

Same thing with Steph. Fewest ppg in a real season in 12 years, but watch him move. Our eyes know we aren't watching the same guy...
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
31,242
Reputation
5,507
Daps
105,830
Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?
YOOOO, there's NO WAY this isn't taken from ChatGPT. Absolutely zero chance this was actually written by a human being :laff:
 

eastside313

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
18,541
Reputation
1,132
Daps
37,182
He shot one 2 and it was a fat toe on the line, that he missed. So yes, all his points came from 3s. That was the last game I saw, vs BK in November. 8-16 from 3, 8-17 in total. And like I said the single 2 was a failed 3 point attempt
So your original statement was incorrect.
 

Left.A1

Superstar
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
19,969
Reputation
794
Daps
53,192
Stan wars :francis: that's all that modern NBA observers are concerned with. It's why the fans of the sport are easily near the bottom of all of the major sports in America
 

Harry B

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
30,853
Reputation
-1,276
Daps
62,036
So your original statement was incorrect.
No, I’m just talking about my experience from one game I saw. Where he tried to shoot only 3s, one was called a 2 and it didn’t go in. If his toe was on the line was hard to see. We are not in court of law, we are talking among people who watch the games.

I have not watched his 1000+ games, but I’d assume if I saw one last week and nobody even mentioned it. It has happened before.

Since you are such a Curry expert, tell me when all his scored shots has only been 3s.


If that was the first time, that talks even more to what I said.
 
Last edited:

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
12,921
Reputation
9,248
Daps
75,590
Reppin
Bay area
There is a similar thread on here about lebron being washed and having regressed and he has better stats

defensive rating as well and he is three years older than curry. I
:laff: this retarded nikka thought having a higher number in defensive rating means it’s better. These are the people nikkas arguing with
 

VegetasHairline

Veteran
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
37,391
Reputation
14,182
Daps
154,061
Reppin
CACS
Care to actually speak on the substantive issue of this post? Clearly posters on here believe there is credence to curry regression argument based on the poll alone. Thus far his stats are lower across the board and his field goal percentage is 82nd in the entire league.

Thoughtful response and I feel reasonable, the question I have is what objective metrics and what non biased evaluation can be used to determine regression or when a player is “washed up”? For example there is a similar thread on this forum with the vast majority of commentary in agreement that lebron has regressed to the point that he is washed up and not a good player anymore. When I look at the stats Lebron has higher points ,rebounds and assists and a better field goal percentage than curry and the difference in team success is 1-2 wins. So are both washed up? If not, why is one criteria use as a basis for one player and disregarded for the other player in comparison. thoughts?
Box score whore!
:umad:
 

eastside313

Superstar
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
18,541
Reputation
1,132
Daps
37,182
No, I’m just talking about my experience from one game I saw. Where he tried to shoot only 3s, one was called a 2 and it didn’t go in. If his toe was on the line was hard to see. We are not in court of law, we are talking among people who watch the games.

I have not watched his 1000+ games, but I’d assume if I saw one last week and nobody even mentioned it. It has happened before.

Since you are such a Curry expert, tell me when all his scored shots has only been 3s.


If that was the first time, that talks even more to what I said.
I’m not the curry expert. But i know better than to say something goofy chit like some
Games he only shoot 3s.
 

Roger king

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
7,980
Reputation
-2,373
Daps
29,505
x.com
x.com

Yeah curry is clearly showing signs of regression this season base on his play and others are noticing as well

''In Steph Curry's first 20 games last year, he hit 30 points 10 times and 40 points twice. In Steph's first 20 games this year he has hit 30 points just three times and is yet to hit 40. Steph has hit the 30 point mark just 8 times total in his last 43 regular season games
.''
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
82,357
Reputation
11,695
Daps
324,739
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
x.com
x.com

Yeah curry is clearly showing signs of regression this season base on his play and others are noticing as well

''In Steph Curry's first 20 games last year, he hit 30 points 10 times and 40 points twice. In Steph's first 20 games this year he has hit 30 points just three times and is yet to hit 40. Steph has hit the 30 point mark just 8 times total in his last 43 regular season games
.''

Listen to Jason Temph brehs, a known lakers and Bron meat slobber…

Go home Roger!!!!!
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
18,396
Reputation
4,935
Daps
80,973
I've looked at the stats to see wassup. And there's no red flags in there. Percentages are good and Warriors kept giving their bench a lot of minutes, meaning Curry also plays couple minutes less per game.

I mean he's 36 years old and coming off the Olympics. Him, Bron and KD are old now. To expect them to go hard in this season, after Olympics, is just not how things work. It's not 2012 anymore.
 
Top