Haile Selassie/Menelik II : "We are caucasian"
- Thread starter GetInTheTruck
- Start date
We gotta be specific tho, if anything the majority of the Horn resemble South Sudanese people rather than Habeshas/Somalis/Sudanese. But its something I've wanted to know, I think the mixing in that part of the world happened much much longer ago than Black people here but I could be wrong I ain't look fully into the subject. I just know that Axum was the point where Habeshas began at, but the mixtures could of happened before this and gone on long after. It'd be a great paper for some PhD type shyt.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
There are country-wide genetic studies on African nations but rarely tribal ones in journals.
So lol, where did they get the samples from obscure tribes that never give samples? What is their methodology for assigning the SNPs, is it valid and scientific? That isn't clear. Post scientific articles, not bullshyt. If what you say is correct then the country-wide studies should further validate what you say.
There are journal articles measuring genes in East Africa which say different to this article. I also see higher non-admixture values in Southern Europe that is reported in several articles, which implies the article is wrong and overestimating white ancestry.
Last edited:
Chesirecatdaddy
All Star
Yall know Caucasian does not = white right?
Nice graph, but what does Northeast African entail? I've always looked at what it calls "Northeast Africans" as Sub Saharan Africans that've had contact with non-Africans over several centuries. Still an interesting graph.
Such as? And if they're obscure and untouched, it can be assumed that they aren't mixed at all or have had any heavy mixing with outside forces.
I feel that many black Americans are delusional about this.
Yea feel you on that, everytime the horn is mentioned someone comes with the
It's just Niolitic people I would assume. Sub-Saharan African is even more ambiguous, seeing as West-East Africans split of long before Horners even came into contact with non-Africans.
Well Cushyte and Nilotic I woul say, but that's what makes the Horn tricky. It's a lot of fferent group.
godkiller
"We are the Fury"
What? Africans tribes are rarely sampled because of how difficult it is to get to the area. I have journal articles on them and there is largely no detectable admixture. Your link gives no list of the number of subjects used, whether they were valid subjects, whether they even used N subjects at all and did not just rely on inference or extrapolation. Your link, for example, says Southern Europeans have no Sub Saharan ancestry on average yet several academic journal article study on the topic says otherwise: Plaza et al. (2003), Plaza et al. (2002), Casas et al. (2006), Alvarez et al. (2007), etc. So your link, which isn't peer reviewed, says one thing which academia contradicts. Guess which side is wrong?
I'm not seeing how that is different than taking people from multiple tribes, cross breeding their strongest, mixing it with Cac and AmerIndian blood?
Such as?
And no DNA tribe definitely shows Italy, Spain, etc having significant Arab blood and a tiny amount of Sub-Saharan ancestry.
MVike28
right around the ACC
like quebec somalis of the horn...b-b-b-ut they speak frenchLikewise lol, everybody in the Horn got dirt on they hands anyway. Maybe Djibouti is clean, but that's just cuz they soft and was happy to be 3rd class French subjects.
Likewise lol, everybody in the Horn got dirt on they hands anyway. Maybe Djibouti is clean, but that's just cuz they soft and was happy to be 3rd class French subjects.
