theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
lol, ur fake as shyt..... but I'm not even mad about it.
The irony
lol, ur fake as shyt..... but I'm not even mad about it.
I appreciate the link u provided in the thread.... I've been checking it out.The irony
last time i checked european inventions and customs are a by product of asian/african influence, without the moors teachings europe woudnt be shyt .i dont imply anything, i say everything directly, i dont give a fuk how people take it and i dont give a fuk whether you agree with me
i said that the europeans were more advanced than than the africans and you went into a hissy fit, that is all that happened, i am not responsible for what your imagination thinks i implied
errlast time i checked european inventions and customs are a by product of asian/african influence, without the moors teachings europe woudnt be shyt .
The ancient African's were simply " anti Academic" plus they weren't speaking proper English...im not sure what point you are trying to dispute, what i said is that when the europeans went to africa they were more advanced and that is why the africans lost, what about that statement is it that you are disputing?
regardless of where or how the europeans got more advanced the point is at the point in time in the 1400-1500's when they started sailing to africa they had become more advanced in terms of technology and that gave them a huge advantage
the where and how the europeans became more advanced is an open question but the fact that they were more advanced is not up for dispute
The ancient African's were simply " anti Academic" plus they weren't speaking proper English...
explain exactly how they were more "technologicilly" advanced, the only reason why europeans successfully enslaved majority of southern africans was because they used the technique devide and conquer.im not sure what point you are trying to dispute, what i said is that when the europeans went to africa they were more advanced and that is why the africans lost, what about that statement is it that you are disputing?
regardless of where or how the europeans got more advanced the point is at the point in time in the 1400-1500's when they started sailing to africa they had become more advanced in terms of technology and that gave them a huge advantage
the where and how the europeans became more advanced is an open question but the fact that they were more advanced is not up for dispute
lol, i was jk w u.lol, its gotten so bad that you have to put words in my mouth
explain exactly how they were more "technologicilly" advanced, the only reason why europeans successfully enslaved majority of southern africans was because they used the technique devide and conquer.
lol, don't be upset. You don't have to cuss all the time either.the african slave trade happened in west africa in the 1400's and 1500's, what you have to do is show that west africans had better technology than the europeans that came to their shores
its that simple, if you cannot show that then you have no point
there is no connection between egypt, carthage, china and west africa by the 1400's and any technological advances had been lost by the time the europeans came in
the portuguese and spanish came with gunpowder and ships, what did the yoruba, igbo, and the akan have to compete with that? that is what you have to explain
does carthage having ships mean that the yoruba had ships? does the egyptians building pyramids mean that the igbo could protect themselves from guns? what the fuk kinda logic is that? you're a fukin clown
lol, don't be upset. You don't have to cuss all the time either.
You stated "Guns, ships and literacy were the main technologies that the european had and the africans lacked" . If you or anyone else would like go with that idea then it's ok - not the end of the world.
Peace.