I_Got_Da_Burna
Superstar
So why put $23mm in his campaign?This district has been red since 1979...
Democrooks have cognitive dissonance like a mothAfukka
So why put $23mm in his campaign?This district has been red since 1979...
It's Already starting lmao.
They need to turnout people who normally don't vote. Repub voters are gonna fall in line.
nope. they went at warren for getting too much clout.lets hope that one day the bernie bros realize a dem winning only helps them because the climate will be more open to their own ideas
Wall Street donors seek to block Warren VP pickBig Wall Street donors have a message for Hillary Clinton: Keep Elizabeth Warren off the ticket or risk losing millions of dollars in contributions
“If Clinton picked Warren, her whole base on Wall Street would leave her,” said one top Democratic donor who has helped raise millions for Clinton. “They would literally just say, ‘We have no qualms with you moving left, we understand all the things you’ve had to do because of Bernie Sanders, but if you are going there with Warren, we just can’t trust you, you’ve killed it.’”
WALL STREET DONORS have used their financial relationship with the Democratic Party to complain bitterly about Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s, D-Mass., influence over the direction of the party
, a new fundraising document reveals. At one point, the Democratic lawmaker in charge of raising cash for House Democrats attempted to reassure donors by pointing to a news story claiming that Warren does not speak for the party.
Like Goldman Sachs, SIFMA lobbyists complained about Warren’s influence. In response, Luján referenced a news article about House Democratic Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi, declaring that Warren did not speak on behalf of the party — something the financial industry lobbyists saw as “an encouraging sign.” But the lobbyists warned that the attacks on the financial sector were creating “a larger problem when people don’t trust banks and financial institutions.”
RIGHT!!!I swear, y'all don't know shyt. This woman was on stage talking about how she doesn't support a living wage and still managed to win. That should tell you something about the voting base there. And why those ideas would not bring them around to voting for a Bernie-esque progressive candidate.
Nah, don't pull that. Thats you and your Bernie bros. We told y'all that shyt wouldn't fly.Yall go from oh we want everybody to be a socialist to OMG this nikka is terrible because of one thing. I love how only the left is seen as being divisive.
THERE IS NO LEFTWING BASE IN GA06.What I find funny is how the appeal must be to suburban Republicans and never turning out your base and getting folks that don't bother voting to vote. It's like the debate is always between those you can expect to vote. Apathy towards politics is strong, folks. I mean I'm sure the base was engaged but folks that just say fukk it need to be tapped into.
Anybody got the turnout numbers for this election?
The fukk that gotta do with GA06?Georgia had a scholarship program for many students that provided tuition free college
Initiated by a popular Dem governor
Some of y'all DO NOT understand republicans. You can't appeal to those fukks.
because his opponent was spending just as much and the results were close.So why put $23mm in his campaign?
Democrooks have cognitive dissonance like a mothAfukka