General Trump Administration F**kery Thread (2025-2029)

[Outlaw]

Why do you amplify obvious grifters?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Why do you amplify obvious grifters?

I was laughing at Lee Fang’s stupid ass

 

[Pressure]

Trump is old but isn’t the old guard. He’s the evolution of the tea party. And the people behind MAGA are not old guard Republican leaders, that’s why there’s so much fukkery. And McConnell hung around because he was effective at stopping the Obama agenda. He opposed that MAGA shyt and then rode the wave. It’s not about who has the “title” it’s about who is cultivating the ideas and communicating it. The Democratic Party strategy is still developed top down by 70 year olds.

The most effective legislation Biden pushed through was crafted by people who were in their 40s or younger. It was a bunch of warrenite ass people but people of that age demographic are not in charge of democratic messaging.

I see what you’re saying.

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

Project 2025 author rejected for top health position — POLITICO

Anti-abortion groups had been pushing former Trump administration official Roger Severino for Health and Human Services deputy secretary.

apple.news

 

[88m3]

 

[No1]

I see what you’re saying.

The flip side is that Gen X might just be fukk boys that can’t be reached.

 

[Pressure]

The flip side is that Gen X might just be fukk boys that can’t be reached.

I don’t have much faith in them or millennials my age tbh

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

His decision to reject corporate PAC money seems more like a calculated move to boost his populist image than a real effort to break away from corporate influence. What makes this more obvious is his actual legislative record, which is still staunchly pro-corporation. He consistently votes for tax cuts for businesses and supports deregulation, so this all feels more like a PR stunt to play into anti-establishment vibes more than a genuine shift in his policy priorities. His symbolic "anti-corruption" bills are all performative too.

In a district like he held in Florida, where he's already deeply entrenched and secure, these kinds of symbolic gestures are far easier to pull off without any real risk to his seat.

 

[Jesus H. Christ]

His decision to reject corporate PAC money seems more like a calculated move to boost his populist image than a real effort to break away from corporate influence. What makes this more obvious is his actual legislative record, which is still staunchly pro-corporation. He consistently votes for tax cuts for businesses and supports deregulation, so this all feels more like a PR stunt to play into anti-establishment vibes more than a genuine shift in his policy priorities. His symbolic "anti-corruption" bills are all performative too.

In a district like he held in Florida, where he's already deeply entrenched and secure, these kinds of symbolic gestures are far easier to pull off without any real risk to his seat.

That's exactly how I feel. Gaetz should've been a smart corporate politician whore and accept the money. What's worse, doing legal briberies for corporate money or advocating corporate policies for free?

He'll more than likely have a nice consulting job somewhere in FL