Elon said “who are you? Do you sti…” he was going to ask him if he still worked for twitter so I could find out who is and fire him
Mans was like “come on Buddy explain a stack from top to bottom to me”
General Elon Musk Fukkery Thread
- Thread starter Armchair Militant
- Start date
Mans was like “come on Buddy explain a stack from top to bottom to me”
Follow up
so fukking embarrassing. Friedman is the same clown who was defending joe Rogan when he called black people apes
Yep. Ultimately, He wants to be Branson but he has no Charisma or common sense to stay above the fray.
Enjoy your stardom with the alt right weirdos.
ADevilYouKhow
Rhyme Reason
Going to $30 a share
NaijaProdigy Redux
Veteran
It doesn’t matter whether he steps down from his CEO role. He’s still the principal shareholder and will exert power as Executive Chairman.
He’s full of shyt
He’s full of shyt
He’s really been exposed as a trust fund baby who grew up rich and inserted himself into several successful businesses as a money guy.
There’s no way he’s actually running Tesla. He’s the public face and he raises capital but there have to be people behind him that make the actual decisions to run the business.
This is a man that spent $44 billion on Twitter and is making company impacting decisions via Twitter polls. While I don’t think he’s actually running Tesla it’s apparent he is running Twitter now and his juvenile like behavior and incompetence is showing.
Either way Twitter will go bankrupt. It’s a great idea that is difficult to transition into a great business. It’s like Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant. It exist, lots of people use it, but the ways to monetize that user base are difficult. Lots of people use Alexa and Amazon can’t do much more than use it as a loss leader to raise brand awareness. With Twitter that’s everything and it isn’t tied to another product.
Branson actually seems likeable. Elon is an insufferable smarmy weirdo incapable of accessing real human emotion from his databank
Last edited:
This guy. 
There are way too many scientists and tech guys who try to insert themselves into public debates with terribly half-assed opinions.
There are way too many scientists and tech guys who try to insert themselves into public debates with terribly half-assed opinions.
This guy.
There are way too many scientists and tech guys who try to insert themselves into public debates with terribly half-assed opinions.
Tyson is a glorified teacher
this dude has over a billion dollars invested in tesla and musk reacting like this.
What’s this about the FBI?
Tyson has a BS in physics from Harvard, an MA in astronomy from Texas, an MPhil and PhD in astrophysics from Columbia, a three-year research postdoc at Princeton, and was employed as a staff scientist at Hayden before he became the director. He has 13 peer-reviewed publications in astronomy/astrophysics, including 5 of which for which he is first author. He has 10x more credentials than you need to be considered a scientist, and I respect his prolific science education work on top of that. There are few enough Black physicists out there that there's no need to diss anyone who has put in the work to succeed in the profession.
Research publications
- Twarog, Bruce A.; Tyson, Neil D. (1985). "UVBY Photometry of Blue Stragglers in NGC 7789". Astronomical Journal 90: 1247. doi:10.1086/113833.
- Tyson, Neil D.; Scalo, John M. (1988). "Bursting Dwarf Galaxies: Implications for Luminosity Function, Space Density, and Cosmological Mass Density". Astrophysical Journal 329: 618. doi:10.1086/166408.
- Tyson, Neil D. (1988). "On the possibility of Gas-Rich Dwarf Galaxies in the Lyman-alpha Forest". Astrophysical Journal (Letters) 329: L57. doi:10.1086/185176.
- Tyson, Neil D.; Rich, Michael (1991). "Radial Velocity Distribution and Line Strengths of 33 Carbon Stars in the Galactic Bulge". Astrophysical Journal 367: 547. doi:10.1086/169651.
- Tyson, Neil D.; Gal, Roy R. (1993). "An Exposure Guide for Taking Twilight Flatfields with Large Format CCDs". Astronomical Journal 105: 1206. doi:10.1086/116505.
- Tyson, Neil D.; Richmond, Michael W.; Woodhams, Michael; Ciotti, Luca (1993). "On the Possibility of a Major Impact on Uranus in the Past Century". Astronomy & Astrophysics (Research Notes) 275: 630.
- Schmidt, B. P., et al. (1994). "The Expanding Photosphere Method Applied to SN1992am at cz = 14600 km/s". Astronomical Journal 107: 1444.
- Wells, L. A. et al. (1994). "The Type Ia Supernova 1989B in NGC3627 (M66)". Astronomical Journal 108: 2233. doi:10.1086/117236.
- Hamuy, M. et al. (1996). "BVRI Light Curves For 29 Type Ia Supernovae". Astronomical Journal 112: 2408. doi:10.1086/118192.
- Lira, P. et al. (1998). "Optical light curves of the Type IA supernovae SN 1990N and 1991T". Astronomical Journal 116: 1006. doi:10.1086/300175.
- Scoville, N. et al. (2007). "The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview". Astrophysical Journal Supplement 172: 1. doi:10.1086/516585.
- Scoville, N. et al. (2007). "COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations". Astrophysical Journal Supplement 172: 38. doi:10.1086/516580.
- Liu, C. T.; Capak, P.; Mobasher, B.; Paglione, T. A. D.; Scoville, N. Z.; Tribiano, S. M.; Tyson, N. D. (2008). "The Faint-End Slopes of Galaxy Luminosity Functions in the COSMOS Field". Astrophysical Journal Letters 672: 198. doi:10.1086/522361.
What I don't respect are his poorly informed opinions on social issues. Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins are even more highly respected scientists than Tyson, and they constantly put out stupid, ill-informed statements on social issues as well. (Sam Harris is a much less respected "scientist" than any of them and yet tries to trade off on bullshyt credentials to push sociopolitical nonsense as well.)
Is that presale debt or post sale debt?
He said $12 billion so it’s post sale
He’s complaining about the FeD raising rates due to the debt Twitter has now