I'm against pedophilia.
I have nothing against homosexuality.
Whats your point?
Pick and choose much?
NAMBLA sitting back like " Its only a matter of time brehs!:
I'm against pedophilia.
I have nothing against homosexuality.
Whats your point?
Pick and choose much?
NAMBLA sitting back like " Its only a matter of time brehs!:
my point wasn't aimed @ you. I, for one, don't agree with either and im vehemently against pedos. but as a society we've become more tolerant of things that were initially seen as immoral. this could potentially open the flood gates breh.I'm against pedophilia.
I have nothing against homosexuality.
Whats your point?
It just boggles my mind how a law that affects some 1-2% of the population could have this kind of siege over the media. A good 20% of daily news is homo related these days. You can't even get a break from it on ESPN smh
Pick and choose much?
NAMBLA sitting back like " Its only a matter of time brehs!:
my point wasn't aimed @ you. I, for one, don't agree with either and im vehemently against pedos. but as a society we've become more tolerant of things that were initially seen as immoral. this could potentially open the flood gates breh.
This is why religious people are fukking idiots and mental midgets. All of these are LITERALLY different issues.
1. Man and his mother? If they're consenting adults, yes. I'd REALLY advise them not to because of genetic complications that would occur if they had kids
2. Man and his dog? Beastiality? No. Thats a consent issue. Until you can demonstrate that a dog CONSENTS to having sex with you, i'm against it.
3. Polygamy? I'm not sure honestly. I think it'd be cool but I wonder how that'd affect the distribution of wealth in society. I'm all for consenting adults to do what they want to do though.
4. blow up doll? How does the doll consent? But if its an inanimate object, I don't care. Its no different from a sex toy.
im sayin tho. when ol boy from the NBA came out it shyt was all over ESPN and even NFL network :terry:
thats the thing about this whole gay agenda. in their ideal world where they are "accepted" nobody would give a fukk about shyt like this. or anything they do. no gay pride parades, no pat on he back parties when somebody comes out etc. but deep down they dont want that. they love the attention.
it's just crazy how america has so many problems like national debt, syria, north korea etc.... and this is always in the headlines
the dog that fukked the chick on facebook clearly consented to having sex with her....
so u'd be ok with that union to occur because of that?
why would i argue to legalize immorality?This is the same argument used against integration.
This slippery slope bullshyt has to stop.
Not all issues of sex or relating to where/how/when you use your penis are on the same accord or address the same issue.
You might as well argue for legalizing rape or forced sex acts.
What about that voting rights act tho?