Don't use chemical weapons in violation of a diplomatic agreementThis country and the people in it are so disgusting some (most of?) times.
I don't get whats so hard.
Assad made a deal in 2013.
He violated that agreement.
Don't use chemical weapons in violation of a diplomatic agreementThis country and the people in it are so disgusting some (most of?) times.
This entire situation is strange. The Syrian gas attack has no rationale to Assad who had all but won the war. Even if you account for Trump's lack of logical thinking this response is excessive even for him. What's the end objective here?
This is the midgame. But who are the players and who are the pieces.
Assad did.Makes u wonder who really gassed those people. As many have said, why would the winning side even need to use those weapons. Questions should be asked, but when the war drums sound, questions are rarely asked. The media is useless.
All you do is post the opposite of what you read.http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-chemical-weapons-red-flags-and-false-flags/5583616
It wasn't the Syrians...
What the Media Isn't Telling You About Yesterday's Chemical Attack in Syria
fukk all you shills, deleting and calling bullshyt when ppl,try to bring up differing views. Why are ppl afraid of more information? It isn't derailing....
I think either the Russians did it to help Trump, or the losing side did it so they could get helpAssad did.
I don't know why you all can't accept this possibility as if this isn't an active war.
You guys really love believing Russian media bluster. Why would the Russians escalate when the strike did little to change very favourable political and military dynamic for them and their regime ally? This is domestic focused rhetoric for nationalists at home who may view the symbolism as symptom of Russian weakness.
At the end of the day the regime will do some ritual crying about conspiracy for a week, Russia will block a resolution, and business will go back to usual. Trump wins domestically for getting focus shifted elsewhere but nothing has changed in Syria. No war is happenin between the States, Russia, or even the regime despite people's active imaginations.
As for US military involvement there's already special forces on the ground on Syria and thousands of strikes for past three years. You are smoking something potent if you think the Russians do not value the fact those attacks by allow regime to focus on rebels. The Russians are shrewd diplomatically and strategically, they're not gonna get rid of this arrangement that helps the regime simply because Trump ordered a single show strike.
Israel has never used gas before.Anyone else have a feeling that it may have been Israel behind the gas attack in Syria?
did you all forget like...Monday?This entire situation is strange. The Syrian gas attack has no rationale to Assad who had all but won the war. Even if you account for Trump's lack of logical thinking this response is excessive even for him. What's the end objective here?
This is the midgame. But who are the players and who are the pieces.
Honestly, our interests in syria come down to:This "bombing" of Syrian airfield is nothing more than a political stunt aimed to rally support behind Trump.
War with Russia isn't coming. China isn't going to be intimidated by us essentially with Assad.
Was chemical weapon strikes a horrific thing? Most def. Do you believe hitting an airfield with nerf guns is going to make Assad think twice?
I ain't for war, and certainly not in Syrian. What exactly are our special national interests in Syria? Oil? We got a surplus of oil , fukk we wanna waste billions on war to get pennies on the dollar in return in oil?
Nothing more than a facade for Trump to get his approval #s up, which, it seems to have worked.
Let me ask you this.
...because they lied?Why Did Syria Still Have Chemical Weapons?
Good timeline of events in Syria that everyone should read