Full circle: Hawk tuah girl suing breh that made her famous
- Thread starter newarkhiphop
- Start date
He seemed upset about her benefiting from the exposure of the video more than her did, so it wouldn’t be far fetched to think that he’s lying about the lawsuit for clout especially since there’s no public record of it.
That’s the only assumption until there’s record otherwise.
That’s the only assumption until there’s record otherwise.
Imagine if she won how many Youtubers/Influencers that do "Man on the Street" interviews in some ways would be facing lawsuits. Sit your Hawk Tuahing ass down. 
Last edited:
That would actually be a good thing.
Why would it be a good thing?
Asking a question on the street deserves a lawsuit? It's no different than a professional reporter asking a question on the street.
#1 it's protected by the 1st Amendment
1. These people are not professional reporters.Why would it be a good thing?
Asking a question on the street deserves a lawsuit? It's no different than a professional reporter asking a question on the street.
#1 it's protected by the 1st Amendment
2. They are not simply asking questions, they are specifically looking for drunk people in order to make them look stupid or generate rage bait. That's why they deserve a lawsuit.
3. They are clogging social media with their lazy content, which is why it would be a good thing if they got sued and disappeared.
Nah not a lawsuit. Again it's 1st Amendment protected speech. You don't want to go down that road.
Tribal Outkast
Veteran
The problem too for these social media folks too is they’re screwed because they don’t have a big corporation backing them.,Tv stations get sued all the time but those people can go at the corporation and sue them instead of the reporter directly. It’s a dirty game out here and you have to make sure you do what you can to make sure you protect yourself. It’s why people will make content for YouTube and make sure they’re not showing random people in their videos and all that. You don’t know who will try to sue you. Getting drunk people to say things to make you go viral is something you might want to be careful with… especially if you go viral.
filming drunk people and then putting them on the internet is not free speech. Free speech means the state is not allowed to persecute you because it doesn't like your opinion. It doesn't mean that a private citizen can't sue somebody for deliberately making them look stupid on the internet.
i dont believe in dikk watching, but thats... kinda bold to be sharing all that
internet is full of bitter weirdoes who would love nothing more than to show that video to her father
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
I would think she gave constructive consent by adopting the footage for her media personality and benefitting from it.
I beg to differ.
The interviewer is not a human breathalyzer.
He's asking questions. He could have been a Baptist Convention and ask questions too.
