Rogers' acquisition of MLSE on Wednesday has raised questions about the future of Masai Ujiri and his leadership of the Toronto Raptors
www.si.com
The relationship between Masai Ujiri and Edward Rogers is now the defining one for the Raptors.
www.nytimes.com
@JLova
@trick
@MikelArteta
@Instant Classic
@jdubnyce
@MVike28
@Malcolmxxx_23
@Patrick Kane
@Wall
@EarlyEarly
@richtree
@Miggs
@the next guy
@broller
@Nomad1
@darius19
@Techniec
@Dirty D
@Auger
@thatrapsfan
@CJ
@Guess Who
@Brosef
@The Infamous
@Max B
@Wise
@kingest_kong
@Broke Wave
@Blade
The Athletic piece from Eric Koreen provides more context
« Accordingly, the onus will be on Ujiri to find a way to co-exist with Rogers, and less on Rogers himself. It was reportedly Rogers who was the most skeptical about paying Ujiri like a top-of-market executive in 2021, two years after Ujiri’s Raptors won the NBA Finals. It was also Rogers who was most
acutely against MLSE going after a WNBA expansion team, with the Toronto Star reporting last October that
Rogers’ relationship with Ujiri was a factor in MLSE not going down that road. (To be clear, it was not the determining factor.) That is what led Tanenbaum to start KSV, the company that purchased the expansion team.
In other words, Ujiri has had to deal with Rogers for his entire tenure running the Raptors, which dates to 2013. He has not, though, had to deal with Rogers as the ultimate authority within MLSE and, therefore, the Raptors. The nature of the relationship changes. Rogers isn’t a boss within MLSE now; he is
the boss.
Does Ujiri, who has largely had carte blanche to run the Raptors as he has seen fit, have the stomach to deal with Rogers? Looking at the Blue Jays, Rogers hasn’t appeared to interfere too closely in day-to-day baseball matters. The Blue Jays spent into the competitive balance tax in 2023 and were poised to do so again this year before the season went comically awry »