Fred Durst Sues UMG For $200 Million in Unpaid Royalties

Artificial Intelligence

Not Allen Iverson
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
57,735
Reputation
8,755
Daps
132,791
How does it work then, because this makes no sense.



"The complaint states that Durst never received royalties from UMG, despite Limp Bizkit having sold more than 45 million records since the band signed in the 1990s with California indie Flip Records, with distribution from UMG’s Interscope.

The complaint says that, so far this year, Limp Bizkit has amassed 450 million streams, and is on track for a total of more than 793 million by year’s end.
The complaint stated that Durst and his Limp Bizkit bandmates received advances on their albums, with UMG covering recording costs, and were to start receiving royalty payments once the costs were recouped, Bloomberg reported.

UMG allegedly told Durst’s representatives that it had spent $43 million on Limp Bizkit’s music, which would have to be recovered before Durst was paid any royalties. UMG also allegedly told Durst’s team that Durst hadn’t received any royalty statements because UMG was “not required to provide them since his account was still so far from recoupment,” according to the complaint."
It cost them 0 dollars to make produce market shoot videos interviews promo.. flying these dudes around the world… studio time? I know what you meant but it looked funny
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,078
Reputation
3,479
Daps
55,960
Reppin
CALI
It cost them 0 dollars to make produce market shoot videos interviews promo.. flying these dudes around the world… studio time? I know what you meant but it looked funny
That's all outlined in the suit

UMG spent a total of $48 million on all of that during the course of their career.

43 million albums sold, at the cost of $48 mil, it can't be possible that UMG lost money on this band.
 

Artificial Intelligence

Not Allen Iverson
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
57,735
Reputation
8,755
Daps
132,791
That's all outlined in the suit

UMG spent a total of $48 million on all of that during the course of their career.

43 million albums sold, at the cost of $48 mil, it can't be possible that UMG lost money on this band.
That’s all they spent …. Ok I got you. I thought it would be more due to the massive success they had.. but if they only spend 48 mill and sold that many albums.. where the fukk is the money?
 

MicIsGod

They like what that mean
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
24,355
Reputation
1,710
Daps
50,950
Reppin
Atl
The numbers don't add up. This band sold over 40 million albums total, at $15 a CD that's about $600 million in revenue. UMG claims they spent $48 million total on the band and haven't recouped their investment.

They made atleast a $552 million dollar profit, and still claiming the band owes?

They aren't even hiding the scam
And that’s just record sales. Not even the pub/royalties. Mfs made at least a billion.
 

Cheese McNair

Bought it this morning, drive it like I stole it
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
18,871
Reputation
5,782
Daps
65,429
Hold on he was signed to UMG all these years? So when Limp Biscuit signed to Cash Money, they basically just got moved to a different department? :jbhmm: Cash Money is under UMG
 

Alvin

Superstar
Joined
Dec 16, 2015
Messages
20,579
Reputation
880
Daps
26,472
y'all forgetting the rolling stones and beatles had issues with labels/managers during their respective eras
 
Top