What a striking thing it is that when you look at the ESPN World Fame 100 list, measuring who are the most famous athletes in the world, you do not find a single player of America’s game until No. 32.
Clearly, this is a crisis, and given that the list is formulated by looking at salary, endorsement money, social media followers and Google search popularity, it is a clear sign that the league is not doing enough to market its top stars and turn them into global phenomena. The question that must be asked is why the situation is this way?
Except, rest assured, nobody associated with the National Football League is fretting about Cam Newton placing on this list right behind tennis star Andy Murray. Just the same, it is not a concern for baseball that its top player on the list is Bryce Harper, at No. 71, with Mike Trout close behind at No. 73. The other baseball players on the list are David Ortiz (78), Robinson Cano (85), Miguel Cabrera (88), Masahiro Tanaka (89), Albert Pujols (93) and, somehow, Matt Kemp (100).
This is a global list and baseball, like football, is a sport without mass international reach. The NFL brand of football is only played here, but it dominates the American sports landscape and has for a long time now. Baseball still has a massive footprint in America, and while it is a bit more international, the scope of baseball fame outside North America is limited to Latin America and Japan, with a bit of interest elsewhere in Asia and Australia.
At the top of ESPN’s list are the brightest lights of the most popular sports in the world. The top 10 is soccer, basketball, soccer, soccer, tennis, basketball, golf, cricket, soccer, tennis.
There is truth to the idea that baseball does not market its stars effectively, but this list hardly is evidence of that. What it shows more is an interesting bit of timing for where baseball is right now.
The other thing about social media, though, is that the audience for it skews young,
while baseball is more popular with an older demographic. That makes a difference that cannot be ignored, as can a facet of sports stardom that inherently hurts individual baseball players in many cases.
Athletes gain the most fame when they compete for championships. While Harper and Trout might be the best players in baseball, neither appeared in last year’s postseason and they have combined to play 12 postseason games — nine by Harper — all in the first round. How much more famous was Jeter because he won the World Series with the Yankees in four of his first five seasons, then went to two of the next three Fall Classics after that? How much higher was Newton on this list as a result of his appearance in the Super Bowl, the one NFL game with a truly global audience?
Baseball does have work to do to expand the reach of its top players and grow the game with a younger demographic. The ESPN list, however, should not set off any alarm bells on Park Avenue.