And you have said absolutely nothing to refute that because you can't it's a fact lmao
what point are you making again
I refuted it in my 1st post about it
#WPOY15
And you have said absolutely nothing to refute that because you can't it's a fact lmao
what point are you making again
IBF and WBO in the same damn boat? I beg to differ.What is the point you are trying to make and what area asking , SERIOUSLY
in one sentence can you ask me what you are talking about
yes WBO was formed in 1998, but it wasn't accepted as a LEGIT sanctioning body until the late 1990's in America even though they had title fights
LOOK IT UP
THE IBF was accepted by Ring during its inception
The WBC didn't recognize the WBO until 2004, and the IBF didn't until 2007, this after the WBO being legitimized in America
If your not arguing the WBO is on par with the WBC and WBA
WHAT ARE YOU ARGUING
you basically agree with me
the IBF and the WBO are in the same damn boat
I refuted it in my 1st post about it
#WPOY15
Lmao how
somebody come get this clown
look at this clown @Newzz yall!!!
Did you come to get me since Master Teacher asked for someone to do it?
so if Japan didn't recognize them unil 2013, HOW COULD THEY BE POSSIBLE RECOGNIZED WORLD WIDE before then
He makes a strong case
What about rigo vs cruz on the undercard?
Canelo back on undercards for floyd? Doubt he'd be happy with thatYes
Put that as the opening fight though with Canelo vs Kirkland as the co-main
He did. I don't even know what possessed me to respond to THEE @Master Teacher
Please forgive me for thinking that the fact numerous great Champions held the WBO Belt and defended it all around the world mattered
Now I know that if Japan didn't recognize them...regardless of Mexico, America, England, etc recognizing them, JAPAN is what really matters
So, I will now invoke The Master Teacher Clause. IBF/WBO Champions prior to 2013 don't count because Japan didn't recognize them until 2013
Never mind the fact that the WBC nor WBA are recognized in every country neither