Floyd Mayweather Jr-Manny Pacquiao Master Discussion Thread

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,474
Reputation
5,213
Daps
57,405
Reppin
Lauderdale
After what loss did cotto beat yuri? We are talking about the trout loss and he fought yuri before that so what exactly are you saying? :mjpls:
After trout beat cotto he lost to canelo and lara while being dropped in both fights, i guess i could argue he was damaged too which led to him being dropped by fnf fighters later :manny:
I have no idea why you just won't admit that your logic was highly flawed when we both know it was. :yeshrug:

No idea why you're trying to save face and bring up a bunch of other things. You initially said cotto would never hang with guys from tito's era because he lost to trout who got dropped by fnf fights guys. That's terrible reasoning and you know it.

You the only nikka up in arms or dense enough to try an argue this shyt breh.

nikkas already know Cotto ain't better than Tito so what you going on about don't mean shyt at the end of the day.

My logic aint flawed. Your boxing knowledge is.

With your logic cats would expect Hearns to lose to Provodnikov since were not acknowledging different levels of skill and stature in the sport. :mjlol:
 

blackestofpanthers

God forgives, you are forgiven.
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
12,920
Reputation
9,238
Daps
75,584
Reppin
Bay area
You the only nikka up in arms or dense enough to try an argue this shyt breh.

nikkas already know Cotto ain't better than Tito so what you going on about don't mean shyt at the end of the day.

My logic aint flawed. Your boxing knowledge is.

With your logic cats would expect Hearns to lose to Provodnikov since were not acknowledging different levels of skill and stature in the sport. :mjlol:
I wouldn't expect hearns to lose to provodnikov :what:
I never said cotto was better than tito or arguing it. I don't care what anyone else gets up in arms about breh.

nikka wouldn't even make it to middleweight.

Cotto might have lost to Oba Carr. Prolly go life and death with Reid and Joppy. I mean this is the same nikka that got that work from Trout. The same Trout that's getting dropped against FNF level cats.

That's flawed right there and you know it. But whatever. You know exactly why it's flawed but are trying to save face for some reason.
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,474
Reputation
5,213
Daps
57,405
Reppin
Lauderdale
Say something is flawed when you can't comprehend it's meaning brehs. :mjlol:

I guess saying Tito would destroy Trout and them FNF nikkas that dropped him is flawed logic. :manny:
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
Please stop replying to me

The WBO didn't become legit till the 90's its a fact, because the US recognized doesn't mean everybody did

The WBO wasnt even FORMED until 1988:mindblown:


Saying it didnt become "legit" until the 90s is MUCH different from saying the late 90s like you said:camby:


They had their 1st Championship match with Thomas Hearns vs James Kinchen in November 1988. I would think with Hearns, Camacho, Jackson, Benn, and Moorer THAT it would be "legit" in the 90s, being that they all won their belts in 88-89:dahell:


I put the IBF above the WBO because it's been around longer and has had better champions

WHY CAN'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT

Where in the post that you quoted did I say anything about "why do you put the IBF over the WBO?":what:


Quit making up shyt:ufdup:

and just because the IBF and WBO are legit does not mean they coveted like the WBA and WBC

WHAT IS IT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND

WHERE DID I SAY THEY ARE COVETED LIKE THE WBA AND WBC IN THAT POST OR ANYWHERE???:mindblown:


When all else fails, ask questions to posters about quotes/posts that never happened brehs:snoop:
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
The WBO wasnt even FORMED until 1988:mindblown:


Saying it didnt become "legit" until the 90s is MUCH different from saying the late 90s like you said:camby:


They had their 1st Championship match with Thomas Hearns vs James Kinchen in November 1988. I would think with Hearns, Camacho, Jackson, Benn, and Moorer THAT it would be "legit" in the 90s, being that they all won their belts in 88-89:dahell:




Where in the post that you quoted did I say anything about "why do you put the IBF over the WBO?":what:


Quit making up shyt:ufdup:



WHERE DID I SAY THEY ARE COVETED LIKE THE WBA AND WBC IN THAT POST OR ANYWHERE???:mindblown:


When all else fails, ask questions to posters about quotes/posts that never happened brehs:snoop:

What is the point you are trying to make and what area asking , SERIOUSLY

in one sentence can you ask me what you are talking about

yes WBO was formed in 1998, but it wasn't accepted as a LEGIT sanctioning body until the late 1990's in America even though they had title fights

LOOK IT UP

THE IBF was accepted by Ring during its inception

The WBC didn't recognize the WBO until 2004, and the IBF didn't until 2007, this after the WBO being legitimized in America

If your not arguing the WBO is on par with the WBC and WBA

WHAT ARE YOU ARGUING

you basically agree with me

the IBF and the WBO are in the same damn boat
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634
What is the point you are trying to make and what area asking , SERIOUSLY

in one sentence can you ask me what you are talking about

yes WBO was formed in 1998, but it wasn't accepted as a LEGIT sanctioning body until the late 1990's in America even though they had title fights

LOOK IT UP

THE IBF was accepted by Ring during its inception

The WBC didn't recognize the WBO until 2004, and the IBF didn't until 2007, this after the WBO being legitimized in America

If your not arguing the WBO is on par with the WBC and WBA

WHAT ARE YOU ARGUING

you basically agree with me

the IBF and the WBO are in the same damn boat

:snoop:


You're changing your argument post by post.:rudy:


Im done. You deserve your badge of honor.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,666
Reppin
NULL
:snoop:


You're changing your argument post by post.:rudy:


Im done. You deserve your badge of honor.

LMAO

what argument

I said the WBA and WBC are the only belts that matter

and I said the IBF has more prestige than the WBO

what did I say in contrary of that

you the one ramble on like a madman with no since of direction

you the one who brought up the IBF
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,470
Daps
104,634

Goddamn I'm a moron, google

once again people say shyt like this, then I prove them wrong, they don't even said my bad, or even acknowledge they don't know shyt

answer question if Japan

http://www.wboboxing.com/japan-decides-to-recogniza-the-wbo/

this is from the WBO website

so if Japan didn't recognize them unil 2013, HOW COULD THEY BE POSSIBLE RECOGNIZED WORLD WIDE before then

That's what you said nikka....keep up with your posts. That's the post I originally quoted:ufdup:
 

LauderdaleBoss

#TunnelGang #RingGangRadio
Staff member
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
18,474
Reputation
5,213
Daps
57,405
Reppin
Lauderdale
nikkas all in the feelings when they can't debate simple boxing shyt that any real fan would understand. :scust:
 
Top