Abstinence education instead of sexual education as a policy that has been tested in the past has been PROVEN to be ineffective
Researchers say that programs advocating abstinence until marriage fail to get teens to delay sexual activity and also prevent them from getting important information about pregnancy and STDs.
www.npr.org
The analysis confirms previous public health findings that abstinence-only education programs don't succeed in reducing rates of teen pregnancies or STDs. Moreover, public health data indicate that such programs "have little demonstrated efficacy in helping adolescents to delay intercourse," the authors write.
I don't understand what the disconnect is. I would definitely prefer teenagers not have sex until they were more mature. I would definitely say saving sex until marriage is wonderful.
Regardless... government should promote policy that that actually works and helps their citizens the most.
You think you're fighting some ideological battle when really I'm just looking at empirical data and taking a stance that would kead to less STDs and teen pregnancies.
Would you rather have higher teen pregnancies as long as you get to promote what you see as right? Or are you willing to promote what works?