But they haven't been able to reach the glass dome either.
The glass dome would be at it's lowest near the edges of earth. You'd think that theyd reach it by now.
I'm not sure what you mean by this
But they haven't been able to reach the glass dome either.
The glass dome would be at it's lowest near the edges of earth. You'd think that theyd reach it by now.
FactsYou can't prove gravity either
And for the record, an apple falling is not proof that there's a force pulling it down.
I did go to that site, I'm not sure what you think was supposed to be answered...
They were completely correct about the constellations and their calendars were accurate down to like a less than 1% variance iircBelieved???? Oh, so they didn't know am I right?
You can't prove gravity either
And for the record, an apple falling is not proof that there's a force pulling it down.
Why flights in the southern hemisphere pass into the northern hemisphere if their destinations are also in the southern hemisphere...What questions did you have?
The lunar eclipse is literally the only thing that can't fully be explained in a flat earth model
But it also can't fully be explained in a globe earth model either...
Cool, what is the basis for gravity now?Newton's apple story isn't the bases of the law of gravity anymore champ.
Can you also post a pic of the tokyo-newark flight?Look at Tokyo-Newark vs Sydney,Austraila-Santiago,Chile. Look how much further Sydney is from Chile on your flat Earth map than Tokyo is from Newark. It makes no damn sense for those two flight to be so close in terms of flight times (~12h50m vs ~12h20m) if the flat earth pic was true. However, if you look at the globe, the distsances between the two sets of cites are actually comparable.
Furthermore, if you look at the flight route for the Sydney-Santiago flight you'll see that it doesn't even take the most direct route on your flat earth map (which would bring you closer to Mexico)
So if your flat earth map was true, the Sydney-Santiago flight would have you traveling a SIGNIFICANTLY longer distance than the Tokyo-Newark flight in a shorter amount of time. Makes no sense.
There's equations that have been used for a long time that you can try out for yourself.Cool, what is the basis for gravity now?
I'm not sure howIt has more credibility with a globe earth model.
Oh ok, please post oneThere's equations that have been used for a long time that you can try out for yourself.
Hide resources in unknown lands/debunk the Bible
I definitely believe in intelligent design, but none of my posts have any religious implications to themfukk you and your shytty book written by goat herders
There is a 20 minute Max time difference over a five hour flight smh
Due to the speed of the earth's rotation the difference should be MUCH MUCH greater
Not only that, the time difference is in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION of what the earth's rotation dictates
The sun sets in the west, meaning the earth rotates eastward, meaning flights going east should take longer
Yet the flights going WEST TO LAX are on average 10 minutes longer than going east from what I see in google flights
Please explain
I definitely believe in intelligent design, but none of my posts have any religious implications to them
Can you explain this for me please?