First trailer for Black Panther 2: No Black Men - Wakanda Forever just dropped

Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
This is the dumbest take I've heard. They used Chadwick Boseman's death as an "excuse" for killing T'Challa? You saying they wanted to kill him off anyway cause they hate money or some shyt?

Both here and in the general public the overwhelming fan opinion was to NOT recast T'Challa. If they had done that you would have run in here hating. Your dumb ass didn't like the first movie anyway so why are you even here?

They have an agenda with black panther, they didn't plan on the first movie being successful, they gave it a ridiculous small budget, it's the most profitable marvel film based on cost to revenue, and they put the character on the back burner besides that, Chadwick barely had any lines in the Avenger movies, he was just a prop, boseman as black panther is not some iconic character beyond reproach, the man was barely relevant in the MCU by design

They already gave him a back seat in his own movie, the man barely had any lines in his own damn movie he was the star in

you don't understand hollywood or the film industry, they do dumb shyt all the time because of their own agenda that fukks money up that would be guaranteed
 

Roger king

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
7,236
Reputation
-52
Daps
28,972
I am not down with this at all, this is another pandering effort to black women and the feminism agenda, even a blind person can see there is a concerted effort or certainly looks like to exclude STRAIGHT black men , just based off the initial trailer i am not interested in watching or supporting this. A black man should be the focus and centre as the king, instead they have turned it into ''protect black women'' women are queens agenda.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
They have an agenda with black panther, they didn't plan on the first movie being successful, they gave it a ridiculous small budget

Don't lie breh, they gave it a $200 million budget, that's one of the biggest Marvel budgets in all of Phase 1 outside of the Avengers ensemble movies. :mjlol:



, it's the most profitable marvel film based on cost to revenue, and they put the character on the back burner besides that, Chadwick barely had any lines in the Avenger movies, he was just a prop, boseman as black panther is not some iconic character beyond reproach, the man was barely relevant in the MCU by design

The Phase 1 core was already set before Black Panther came on the scene, Black Panther was introduced in Phase 1 but wasn't supposed to take the center until Phase 2. There were still critical roles for Black Panther in Civil War and Wakanda in Endgame, but the whole point of late-Phase 1 introductions was to set up the Phase 2 main players. It's not their fault Chadwick died.



you don't understand hollywood or the film industry, they do dumb shyt all the time because of their own agenda that fukks money up that would be guaranteed

This is why you're a WOAT, if you think these millionaire and billionaire businessmen prioritize any agenda over their profit you're an idiot.

By your "agenda" argument, shouldn't Captain Marvel have had a bigger role in Phase 1? Captain Marvel had a much smaller budget than Black Panther, her character was placed in fewer movies, and her roles in those other movies were way more irrelevant. Just like BP, she was being introduced in Phase 1 just to set up for Phase 2. She checks off all your "agenda" boxes yet was downplayed far more than BP was. She kills your ridiculous "agenda" argument.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
Yall nikkas be trippin in here

Chad is dead. They honoring him. There’s literally another black man standing next to them. The “Mexicans” are representing a whole other ethnic group being introduced. Another BP has been born.

Trailer was lit too… Also, Killmonger is in the movie.


On IMDB the front-page cast list has Winston Duke, Isaach De Bankolé, Jarrell Pyro Johnson, and Curtis Bannister. If Killmonger in it too that's 5 featured Black men in addition to 10 or so Black women. Meanwhile there's literally just one Mexican and one Native American on the list.

These weirdos just look silly complaining about other ethnic groups getting a single person in the MCU. Even outside of T'Challa, Killmonger, Nakia, Okoye, Shuri, W'Kabi, M'Baku, Zuri, Ramonda and the other Black Panther characters, the MCU already has Nick Fury, Falcon, War Machine, Valkyrie, Heimdall, Kang the Conqueror, Monica Rambeau, Ravonna Renslayer, MJ, Gamora, and Phastos and pretty soon they gonna have Blade and probably Luke Cage and Miles Morales coming in. Getting angsty over the Mexicans having one side character just looks insecure.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
Don't lie breh, they gave it a $200 million budget, that's one of the biggest Marvel budgets in all of Phase 1 outside of the Avengers ensemble movies. :mjlol:





The Phase 1 core was already set before Black Panther came on the scene, Black Panther was introduced in Phase 1 but wasn't supposed to take the center until Phase 2. There were still critical roles for Black Panther in Civil War and Wakanda in Endgame, but the whole point of late-Phase 1 introductions was to set up the Phase 2 main players. It's not their fault Chadwick died.





This is why you're a WOAT, if you think these millionaire and billionaire businessmen prioritize any agenda over their profit you're an idiot.

By your "agenda" argument, shouldn't Captain Marvel have had a bigger role in Phase 1? Captain Marvel had a much smaller budget than Black Panther, her character was placed in fewer movies, and her roles in those other movies were way more irrelevant. Just like BP, she was being introduced in Phase 1 just to set up for Phase 2. She checks off all your "agenda" boxes yet was downplayed far more than BP was. She kills your ridiculous "agenda" argument.

Listen and stop arguing like familiar, you don't know you're talking about it

this why you're dumb idiot c00n that watches children movies

every marvel movie has production budget of 200 million dollars, that doesn't mean they spent 200 million to make the movie, that's just what it's in the production account dumb ass

They could've spent 200 million, but they didn't that's just the max available for them to use to make the movie

so when you type in google and they said production budget, that's what comes up, that doesn't mean that's what was spent you moron

Boseman was only paid 500,000 and he the lead actor

You really think they spent 200 million on that garbage ass green screen CGI that was half down in that movie, you're an idiot

they used the bare minimum of that budget to make that film, I shouldn't have said they gave the film a low budget, I should've said they spent a low amount of the budget to make the movie

I literally posted an executive summary from a movie on this site before, and yall still don't get because you to busy trying to win an argument
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
Listen and stop arguing like familiar, you don't know you're talking about it

this why you're dumb idiot c00n that watches children movies

every marvel movie has production budget of 200 million dollars, that doesn't mean they spent 200 million to make the movie, that's just what it's in the production account dumb ass

They could've spent 200 million, but they didn't that's just the max available for them to use to make the movie

so when you type in google and they said production budget, that's what comes up, that doesn't mean that's what was spent you moron

Boseman was only paid 500,000 and he the lead actor

You really think they spent 200 million on that garbage ass green screen CGI that was half down in that movie, you're an idiot

they used the bare minimum of that budget to make that film, I shouldn't have said they gave the film a low budget, I should've said they spent a low amount of the budget to make the movie

I literally posted an executive summary from a movie on this site before, and yall still don't get because you to busy trying to win an argument


You're literally just making shyt up breh. :dead:






No they don't spend $200 million on every Marvel movie, that wasn't true before OR after Black Panther. Literally all of the character debuts except for Guardians of the Galaxy were lower than that. Hulk debut was $137 million, Captain America and Iron Man debuts were $140 million each, Thor was $150 million, Ant Man was $130 million, Dr. Strange was $165 million, Captain Marvel was $152 million. Spiderman came right before Black Panther and was the closest in budget but still was just $175 million.

Stop making shyt up.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
You're literally just making shyt up breh. :dead:






No they don't spend $200 million on every Marvel movie, that wasn't true before OR after Black Panther. Literally all of the character debuts except for Guardians of the Galaxy were lower than that. Hulk debut was $137 million, Captain America and Iron Man debuts were $140 million each, Thor was $150 million, Ant Man was $130 million, Dr. Strange was $165 million, Captain Marvel was $152 million. Spiderman came right before Black Panther and was the closest in budget but still was just $175 million.

Stop making shyt up.

Do you know what the word budget means yes or no
Screen rant says Guardians of the Galaxy budget was 232 million, but you just said it was less, you see how these articles all contradict themselves
you believe everything read
In business a budget estimate between expenses and revenue

They did not spend the entire budget making any of those movies, that's why it's called a budget you fukking moron

you posting articles from people who don't do business or make movies or do anything where have to use budget, so you don't understand what a bugdet it

The Hulk is cheap ass movie Iron Man was cheap ass movie, the budgets increased as marvel got bigger

Black Widow as 200 million budget just like black panther, it wasn't a big movie
The last spider-man that came out the budget was 220
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
Do you know what the word budget means yes or no
Screen rant says Guardians of the Galaxy budget was 232 million, but you just said it was less, you see how these articles all contradict themselves

No I didn't say it was less, I said it was the only one that was more than Black Panther. You can't even read my comments correct.




They did not spend the entire budget making any of those movies, that's why it's called a budget you fukking moron

Your entire argument was that Marvel intended Black Panther to fail and thus gave it a tiny budget. Now you're claiming that they gave it a huge budget but not all of it was spent. So that completely contradicts your original argument AND doesn't make any sense at all.

Black Panther had a bigger budget than any other Phase 1 debut except for Guardians of the Galaxy. Sorry.




Black Widow as 200 million budget just like black panther, it wasn't a big movie
The last spider-man that came out the budget was 220

Yes, the Phase 2 budgets are larger because revenue has been a billion plus recently so they had room to splurge. This doesn't change the fact that $200 million was a huge budget for a solo debut back in Phase 1 when Black Panther came out.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
52,664
Reputation
23,360
Daps
246,550
Reppin
St louis
This shyt is fukkin beautiful.
you miserable fakkits are trippin.
KJFKob7.gif







UKVu0t8.gif
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
No I didn't say it was less, I said it was the only one that was more than Black Panther. You can't even read my comments correct.






Your entire argument was that Marvel intended Black Panther to fail and thus gave it a tiny budget. Now you're claiming that they gave it a huge budget but not all of it was spent. So that completely contradicts your original argument AND doesn't make any sense at all.

Black Panther had a bigger budget than any other Phase 1 debut except for Guardians of the Galaxy. Sorry.






Yes, the Phase 2 budgets are larger because revenue has been a billion plus recently so they had room to splurge. This doesn't change the fact that $200 billion was a huge budget for a solo debut back in Phase 1 when Black Panther came out.

I didn't say they invented to fail, I said they don't want him to be the face of MCU, there you go lying again, you a liar man, that shows who you are as man

They didn't expect the first black panther to be the phenom it was, after the success, you would think they would make him an integral part of the avengers team, but he was an after thought, he got thanos snapped, all the momentum for that first movie was wasted

they didn't want the character in the forefront despite the success, that's an agenda, when Iron Man was popular they made everything centered around iron man, when Black Panther is the hottes thing smokey they removed him from the story, that's a fact

the phase 2 budgets aren't that much bigger though, it just means more money is available they foresee extra expenses

this how movies work, you don't know how much everything costs, you just have an estimate, if you have few locations in your movie you'll have lower budget because you an estimate the cost of having few locations, then the next movie can have several different locations and you need a bigger budget because you don't know what kind of obstacles you are going to run into, etc

It doesn't mean I'm spending the whole fukking budget, that's idiocy, you're suppose to manager the budget

that's why coogler is where he's at now, he proved he could a manage a big budget by making that cheap ass black panther movie you can already tell the production values are much bigger for this movie now that it's the color purple in the MCU
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,840
Reppin
the ether
I didn't say they invented to fail, I said they don't want him to be the face of MCU, there you go lying again, you a liar man, that shows who you are as man

Breh this is what you said:

They have an agenda with black panther, they didn't plan on the first movie being successful, they gave it a ridiculous small budget, it's the most profitable marvel film based on cost to revenue, and they put the character on the back burner besides that, Chadwick barely had any lines in the Avenger movies, he was just a prop, boseman as black panther is not some iconic character beyond reproach, the man was barely relevant in the MCU by design

You portrayed it as if they intended his character to be irrelevant and purposely fukked up the movie's budget to that end. Sorry, that reads a lot like they're intending the character to fail.




They didn't expect the first black panther to be the phenom it was, after the success, you would think they would make him an integral part of the avengers team, but he was an after thought, he got thanos snapped, all the momentum for that first movie was wasted

they didn't want the character in the forefront despite the success, that's an agenda, when Iron Man was popular they made everything centered around iron man, when Black Panther is the hottes thing smokey they removed him from the story, that's a fact

It's like you don't even understand how this works. Phase 1 was already planned long before Black Panther ever hit, they weren't gonna suddenly add a new central member to the main 5 when all of the Avengers movies other than Infinity War/Endgame had already been made. The line went Avengers-Age of Ultron-Civil War-Infinity War/Endgame, and they kept the same central cast for all of them.

Spiderman and Dr. Strange both got Thanos snapped too, they were late additions that were never intended to be Phase 1 stars just like Black Panther. Captain Marvel was so irrelevant that she wasn't even there for the Thanos snap, you keep ignoring her even though her solo movie made over $1.1 billion worldwide on just $152 million budget. She has FAR less shine in the movies than Black Panther does.

Why didn't the agenda put her into the main cast?
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
28,010
Reputation
1,286
Daps
60,664
Reppin
NULL
Breh this is what you said:



You portrayed it as if they intended his character to be irrelevant and purposely fukked up the movie's budget to that end. Sorry, that reads a lot like they're intending the character to fail.






It's like you don't even understand how this works. Phase 1 was already planned long before Black Panther ever hit, they weren't gonna suddenly add a new central member to the main 5 when all of the Avengers movies other than Infinity War/Endgame had already been made. The line went Avengers-Age of Ultron-Civil War-Infinity War/Endgame, and they kept the same central cast for all of them.

Spiderman and Dr. Strange both got Thanos snapped too, they were late additions that were never intended to be Phase 1 stars just like Black Panther. Captain Marvel was so irrelevant that she wasn't even there for the Thanos snap, you keep ignoring her even though her solo movie made over $1.1 billion worldwide on just $152 million budget. She has FAR less shine in the movies than Black Panther does.

Why didn't the agenda put her into the main cast?

I said exactly what I said, they spent bar minimum making the movie, the cgi was horrible, and unfinished, the cast were paid peanuts

these are facts

The movie blew up, Panther was easily the most popular character in the MCU

you would think due to popularity the character would have a more impactful role in the MCU going forward, but it's the exact opposite, the character was diminished, and put on the back burner, he had one or two lines in Infinity war, and no lines at all in the end game

it was an agenda to put him in the background which goes against business sense when he is immensely more popular than any of the avengers at the time
 
Top