"you don't know nann nikka that dress fresher than me/ you don't know nann nikka that wear more big baller shyt than me bytch / you don't know nann" 


BIG BALLER brand u fukking broke bytch learn the name

People not understanding the $495 price point...
Called overhead... Very small business can't compete price wise with a major shoe companies pricepoint
However, not that bad... I mean I wouldn't buy them but
That logo gotta go though
There's a part of me that thinks they put $495 out just to get people talking about that instead of the actual shoe and their plan is to drop the price. Like they weren't sure if the shoe was going to be perceived as ugly by the public so they put up an outrageous price to distract you from talking about the shoe. But since the consensus seems to be they're okay looking and at least look better than the Currys and won't be clowned as such, they'll drop the price and say they did it for the people or something.

He had Steve barry backing him... Steve barry got caught up with insider trading (I think) or just went bankrupt? and that's why you never saw another starbury.Marbury sold his shoes for less than 20 dollars.
Nah ain't nobody copping those for that price because future rocked them. That mainly happens with upper echelon brands and limited sneaker releases not what I'm assuming will be regular release sneakers. They look like Kobes which isn't a bad way to go.It ain't cheap to produce shoes if you don't own factories.
If they can get Migos and/or Future to rock this, a sizable amount of people will buy this.![]()
