This movie getting attacked from all sorts of angles
but everyone who has watched it so far has said its good
This movie getting attacked from all sorts of angles
but everyone who has watched it so far has said its good
This movie getting attacked from all sorts of angles
but everyone who has watched it so far has said its good
On a surface level. If you look at from a stand point of pure action fantasy like black panther and you are somewhat ignorant about african culture I can see why someone would say its good. Cause in that aspect its a standard 2022 movie with the standard sprinkles of woman empowerment and including a gay character etc. But when you look at it as a movie that is supposed to be based in Africa in the 1800 and early 1900 its pretty ridiculous. Not even getting into the historical inaccuracies. The accents alone are terrible. The fact that 2 white women wrote this movie is also very apparent cause its all surface level. There is no need for essays or dissertations cause this movie aint that deep. Its Disney feel good movie status.
As far as the boycott stuff. Kind of silly cause the movie is complete work of fiction and just based on historical figures. They never said it was based on a true story or historically accurate. Folks have no problem supporting fictional movies and shows of racist europeans and colonizers. Whether its spartans and movies like 300 or game of thrones or the 100s of fantasy movies about Europe in ww2. etc..
It should be attacked. You would never see a Jewish person making a movie showing Nazis as being virtuous. That is literally what is happening in that movie about Dahomey. There was nothing virtuous about Dahomey as it was nothing but a little piece of shyt kingdom that was a vassal State to the Yoruba Oyo Empire. Dahomey literally had to pay Oyo tribute or they would get bytch slapped into oblivion. Dahomey only gained power and wealth after becoming the slave catching arm of White people. Dahomey literally conspired with White people in the slave trade era and the Europeans gave Dahomey arms which was done for Dahomey to attack other Black people to sale them as slaves to the Europeans.
Dahomey did more damage to Black people than any rapper ever did and Dahomey only stopped after their White daddies attacked them in order to colonize that shythole kingdom. But people will give Viola Davis and those other heifers pushing that Black female empowerment bullshyt a pass for doing a low-key humble brag for slave catching nikkas and their White daddies. Those same people will then turn around and attack rappers. Basic DNA testing will show that if you have Togo/Benin DNA then that is almost certainly because of Dahomey. That movie is a complete insult to our ancestors that were attacked and/or murdered in the transatlantic slave trade.
I keep hearing and reading that the Dahomey Kingdom raided and used slaves so they won't watch the movie.
My response: Well, duh! Guess what!? Many historical polities, peoples and individuals did some fukked up stuff, including owning and selling slaves from Rome, Ancient Greece, The British Empire, The Persian states, The Aztecs, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and many more. Yet, we (me included) still watch fictional media based on historical polities, peoples and individuals.
I'm not watching The Woman King because it looks like crap not because of slavery and other historical atrocities.
Also can we dead the whole 'black people sold other black people as slaves' canard. It's such a simplistic view of history. Black people aren't a unified, monolithic group (never was or never will be). Nobody uses the argument of 'white people sold other white people as slaves' or 'Amerindian people sold other Amerindian people as slaves'. Why? because they know that Amerindians, whites etc aren't a monolith. Simple.
Yes the fukk they doNobody uses the argument of 'white people sold other white people as slaves
Also if you have recent Yoruba ancestry.
Somewhat, but some Yoruba DNA also stemmed from the Oyo Civil War. That war flooded the slave market because the Yoruba were getting their internal enemies up out of there which took their attention off of beating the brakes off of those Dahomey bum bytches. However you are correct, because Dahomey did attack some of the westernmost Yoruba in modern day Nigeria and modern day Benin.
In fact it is an insult that Dahomey named its modern country after the Empire of Benin, because the Empire of Benin banned slave trading back in the 1500s. So now people that don't know history think that the modern country of Benin is the same as the Empire of Benin.
It's clear that you didn't read my whole post. Try harder.Yes the fukk they do
Lying piece of shyt
I saw they edited Wikipedia in conjunction with the movie saying the women wanted to trade palm oil but the men were obsessed with slave trading.
This is like saying every black man was Bigger Long while Signare or Osu women or Madam Tinubu never existed
It's clear that you didn't read my whole post. Try harder.
I think people would be upset if a WW2 film came out that portrayed fascists in a sympathetic light.
I think some Africans in the diaspora are annoyed because potentially their ancestors were sold into slavery by figures who are lionized in this film.
Projection much. Oh wait you're one of the shaming dikk watchers on 'Jason Black goes in on Passport Bros' thread. Nothing to see here and certain you ain't worth a 3rd world latrine.
The illogical ass shyt