Khalil's_Black_Excellence
The King of Fighters
i can't believe someone as savvy is me just discovered this
i hated how many pages stupids DMS took up.. errythang at 50 now
Yeah, i was on that since the days.
i can't believe someone as savvy is me just discovered this
i hated how many pages stupids DMS took up.. errythang at 50 now
what's the over/under on @satam55 having at least 3 monitors?
the way he's always first to embed tweets, and post ign video reviews and redeem his ultraviolet codes i'm picturing dude with a setup like in the matrix
Naw, I just leave a bunch of tabs open on my phone & PC.what's the over/under on @satam55 having at least 3 monitors?
the way he's always first to embed tweets, and post ign video reviews and redeem his ultraviolet codes i'm picturing dude with a setup like in the matrix
*Satam sees new film trailer*
*Doesn't pick up on the cultural references in it*
*Posts*
WTF???? Ignoring you off the strength of this dumb ass post. Marvin Gaye is fukking INCREDIBLE, his music is still relevant todayHow is it timeless if you have to be born in that era to enjoy it . I've only seen people born in the pessimistic era listen to his music. Every song from 60-70's is not timeless
He died the year before I was born and I love his music. you're sounding really stupid right now.
Anyone can appreciate movies and music from before their time.
What the hell? Marvin Gaye ain't timeless? MJ and prince ain't timeless?? There's a reason you can still here lets get it on or what's going on or any MJ song playing they're the definition of timeless breh.
There's no intrinsic quality that makes Marvin Gaye's music timeless. Your condition for Marvin Gaye being timeless seems to be "I like it and it's still played." Marvin Gaye's music is specifically tied to a certain time and place with specific values needed to enjoy it in it's proper entirety. It seems like you guys only enjoy his music because somebody already defined it as timeless so you were forced to enjoy it without thinking for yourself. Calling Marvin Gaye's or Michael Jackson's music as "timeless" is just a mean tactic of trying to justify one's taste.
Now Mozart, that's real universal timeless music since it's actually withstood the test of centuries.
No bro, I'm honestly just saying it's too early for it to be considered timeless music.So you're comparing something that has lasted for centuries vs something that has lasted for about 5 decades? That's kinda apples to oranges breh. And the fact that its lasted 5 decades should be enough at this point since none of us are going to get to see how it plays out centuries from now. Now if you don't like Marvin Gaye or any older soul music from that era, that's cool, but clearly there are plenty of people who disagree thus the music has stood the test of time. I'm not a Madonna fan but I can recognize that she is a legendary artist and has stood the test of time with her music and just her persona.
No bro, I'm honestly just saying it's too early for it to be considered timeless music.