Vickery from 2011 shytting on the English media and their hypocrisy.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/timvickery/2010/12/fifa.html
Greg Dyke was just talking about little rocks in the ocean shouldn't have as much as say as England or Germany. Talked about helping Africa but saying England don't need their money, we will help you. Sounded like slavery all again.
It actually has the proper population and infrastructure to sustain a world cup and even though it has atrocious human rights records, they aren't as bad as their neighbors.
Qatar's having to import slaves to do the construction and once the cup is over those stadiums are gonna be multi-million dollar sand collectors.
I hear you but given the resources needed for a World Cup, Iran would never happen. If World Cups went to countries with the right populations and infrastructure, it would be USA, England, France and Germany trading World Cups.
If Iran expressed an interest in hosting I'm not sure the Europeans, Americans, even their own neighbors and sponsors, wouldn't bytch.
Why are you for Qatar ?
Not about caping for Qatar, it's just facts. Money talks for international tournaments and Qatar has it. Qatar has the money and influence, Iran doesn't. It was either going to be Dubai or Qatar
Qatar Royal family own one of the biggest clubs in Europe (PSG), a major international network (BeIn Sports) and they're connected with the best team in the world (Barcelona).
Last edited: