But of those, only some of the court stuff is a privilege they actually get. Abortion rights aren't a privilege.
Abortion rights, I believe, were 2/5 things I listed. And yes, they do count when it is at the expense of the man's wallet and/or emotional state. When men get a say in their own children, it will stop being a privelege. It will remain a privelege as long as society and the law shyts all over men and their feelings towards their unborn child.
I never said they said that, though. I'm saying that, because it's an empirical reality. When was the last time you saw a man campaigning about daycare? If you went up to your more macho friends and told them you wanted to be a babysitter/daycare activist, would they applaud and encourage you?
I don't even know what a babysitter or day care activist IS... But considering so many dudes I know are parents, I very highly doubt that I would get clowned for supporting "free day care." This is why we need studies. Two people can have two completely different perspectives. Yours is not any more correct than mine.
Besides, if you look up either Gloria Steinem or the NOW, you can see their words for yourself- they are never "anti-men" or exclusionary of men. They've both worked on issues that target minority men, working class men, etc, for decades.
That may be true, but its simply not important. It doesn't really count against any of the points I've made. I never said they were anti-male.
