Farrakhan Was Right About Black Organizations

xoxodede

Superstar
Joined
Aug 6, 2015
Messages
11,065
Reputation
9,240
Daps
51,605
Reppin
Michigan/Atlanta
minister Farrakhan and the noi has never made a serious effort to work with other organizations unless they did things the noi way.

Other meaning Black?

If so, correct. Because they were not truly BLACK.

But, that doesn't mean they didn't support them or have their back. Cause they did. But, he called them out for any BS they were on. Or allowing non-Blacks to control them.


Jesse:



NAACP:


 

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,429
Other meaning Black?

If so, correct. Because they were not truly BLACK.

But, that doesn't mean they didn't support them or have their back. Cause they did. But, he called them out for any BS they were on. Or allowing non-Blacks to control them.


Jesse:



NAACP:


prior to rev jackson running for president exactly how did the noi and the rainbow coilation work together for the interest of the community? working with black folk on the basis of skin color and not on common interest does not help us
 

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,429
7d533129b24633f6febc43c25e3d8a44.jpg


Are you sure?
positive= this is for a paycheck. foi is not protecting the rev for free. what black org has the noi work with that is about our liberation?
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,687
Reputation
14,585
Daps
201,840
Reppin
Above the fray.
positive= this is for a paycheck. foi is not protecting the rev for free. what black org has the noi work with that is about our liberation?
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that you might have been aware of the setting of the photo. It was during Jesse's first run for president.

and you switched your comment from

"minister Farrakhan and the noi has never made a serious effort to work with other organizations unless they did things the noi way"


to
"what black org has the noi worked with that is about our liberation?"

This is the no b.s. section of the board, so please take those antics to other sections of the forum.
 

jackson35

Banned
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
6,750
Reputation
-2,338
Daps
6,429
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought that you might have been aware of the setting of the photo. It was during Jesse's first run for president.

and you switched your comment from

"minister Farrakhan and the noi has never made a serious effort to work with other organizations unless they did things the noi way"


to
"what black org has the noi worked with that is about our liberation?"

This is the no b.s. section of the board, so please take those antics to other sections of the forum.
so noi providing security for rev jackson for a fee is black liberation to you? but when it comes to concrete work, the minister wants to tells how what they are doing wrong.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,687
Reputation
14,585
Daps
201,840
Reppin
Above the fray.
Civil Rights Institute apologizes over Angela Davis
Updated 2:59 PM; Posted 2:29 PM
33IF73UQENCTXNLACNJVYQ2LJA.jpg

The Birmingham Civil Rights Institute has issued an apology for its handling of the withdrawal of an award for Angela Davis. (Jake May)

0 shares
By Greg Garrison | ggarrison@al.com

The Birmingham Civil Rights Institute today issued an apology for its handling of the withdrawal of its top award for controversial activist Angela Davis.

“Each member of the Board of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute deeply regrets the impact that the handling of the Reverend Fred L. Shuttlesworth Human Rights Award has had on Dr. Angela Davis, the City of Birmingham, and many others who have been impacted by our handling of the award,” the board said in a public statement. “We are sorry.”

The apology comes after Birmingham Mayor Randal Woodfin chastised the board last week.

“We acknowledge that the culmination of our decisions and actions has caused division in the community and compromised the good name of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute on the world stage,” the statement from the board said. "Regardless of the outcome of our vote, many have rightfully questioned our selection process, which we vow to improve. In hindsight, more time, conversation and consideration of diverse viewpoints should have informed our decision to rescind our nomination, and we were silent for too long afterward. Again, we accept responsibility and are sorry.

“There are many lessons we already are learning from this situation. In the coming weeks, we will take steps to learn even more. We ask you to still maintain your support of the Institute as we attempt to regain your trust and learn from this experience. Thank you.”

For full coverage of the Angela Davis controversy, click here.
 
Top