@bk @Brooklynzson I'll donate a stack to have @malcolmxxx_45 username permanently changed to malc00nxxx_45
Actually I hope that happens
Last edited by a moderator:
@bk @Brooklynzson I'll donate a stack to have @malcolmxxx_45 username permanently changed to malc00nxxx_45
Actually I hope that happens
they accept coli cash don't they?
Set it to 50 breh. Unless you're concerned about the additional bandwidth or mem/cpu load with providing the additional posts per page, it makes no sense to arbitrarily inflate the number of pages a thread has.
Too many posts per page in a pic heavy thread can be a DOG for those who have struggle connections....namely while on a cell phone.
had it set to 15 posts by default so why bump it so high, as you put it, arbitrarily???
Especially since they're doubling the number of images allowed per post....
It arbitrarily inflates the number of pages a threads has by setting it too low, with very little benefit. A thread with only 100 posts would have 10 pages. That's 9 times I'd have to click next on the page, wait for the page to render, then start reading. If the concern is bandwidth or server load, that's one thing, but bk said that hardware isn't the problem.
And if your cell phone is using the edge network in 2013, throw yaself in the damn bushes
Do you really want to use what sohh did as a comparison
Is there a way to have a pic limit or for all pics to be in thumbnail or re-sized version for the mobile..that jbo thread on the new site is killing my cell