Why not show him laid the fukk out like Sharif then? There would be no room for interpretation.
It's an artistic decision, to end with a gunshot and cut to black insread of lingering on a dead body.
Which leaves it up to interpretation.
Of course someone gets to interpret a work how they want to. But as I said in my last post, that doesn't make any interpretation reasonable. And coming to the conclusion that Cain lived is unreasonable, at least based on the justification offered up in this thread "we didn't see the dead body."but the filmmakers don't get to decide how the viewer interprets their work.
if something is left even the slightest bit ambiguous, the work can end up taking a life of its own.
yes i think it is heavily implied that he died, but an optimist might choose to look at it differently. and again considering you don't visibly see him die, you can't tell that person they're wrong.
I feel like Sharif's death was more tragic then Cain's death.
Sharif was wildin like Cain and O-Dog, but changed his life, found religion and was trying to help his homies change their lives.
Even Sharif's pops(Charles S. Dutton) was proud of the man that he was becoming.
Then he get shot and killed on some innocent bystander shyt.
Just watch M2S three days ago in in HDblood and guts everywhere
I truly understand what Charles S. Dutton was talking about now,,
