If she asks you to stop, you stop
nikkas making it sound like some out of control shyt
She’s irritating, but she’s not wrong
It’s not thoughThe problem isnt that you have to stop when she wants to stop.
The problem is that it can get arbitrary, which would make it difficult to defend yourself from a false allegation in a legal process that favors women
No means no
They’re not theorizing.I agree with what shes saying but something seems weird to me. Why are chicks theorizing this shyt anyway? Like for example, if a chick meets a nikka she's feeling, and they having sex and hlf way through it starts to hurt or she doesn't feel well and says stop, thats all good. Shes 150% in her right to do that and a nikka better stop, period. But it seems like some chicks are like...idk....it's like they WANT to be in this situation? Like a chick is going into sex on some "ok, im gonna tell him to stop after 20 strokes and see how he reacts". THAT is some bullshyt, and it's kind've some deranged thinking. Why would women be hanging out casually with their home girls and thinking about stuff like that? "Yeah imma fukk him tonight and say stop, and see if he's a rapist" like wtf....
Maybe im trippin, willing to hear what others think.
It’s be more akin to someone in a boxing match getting punched, saying “stop,” and the other person to keep punching them.I think part of the problem for dude's understanding is that no other crime works this way.
Imagine this in a different context,
You're at the crib with your buddies and you're boxing in the backyard. You're going for a combo and you after the left your friend says "stop" but your fist already on its way there. You hit him and then dude presses charges for aggravated assault.
This guy:
- Came over to your house
- Put the boxing gloves on
- Stepped in the ring
These things all imply that he was agreeing to box, so it is natural for you to deduce that it is ok to punch him. And the charges most likely won't stick.
Sexual assault doesn't work this way, its not something you can logic your way through. But most dudes aren't lawyers or paralegals so they don't spend time brainstorming consent scenarios like this woman is doing here. They're going on the same logic they used in the boxing metaphor: You came over to my spot, took your clothes off, and got in bed.
Like you were getting at with your post, many of these guys don't go in with an "intent" to do anything wrong, but you can't control how people will react.
its whatever but i dont understand why anybody would still even have a hard on when someone says stop or no. shyt sounds like a turn off to me are men that desperate and out of control? (idk why i am asking that question lol)
let a nikka say no or stop and im hoping off the dikk swiftly. its not that serious, plenty of willing dikk in the world. push me away and they'll be lucky to even get another whiff
They’re not theorizing.
Happens to women (and men) all the time.
A lot of men (and women) keep going, moving from consent to non-consent, literally raping the other person.
Me and my ex were having sex at a cabin, and she was a having a bit of discomfort, so when my stroke went a little too deep, and it hurt, she told me to stop for a bit, and of course I did. I was incredibly in the moment, and craving her sexually, but i also stopped because the consent to continue wasn’t there.
I had a girl ride me before, and she damn near snapped my dikk trying to do some nonsense she saw in porn. I told her to stop and laid her on the bed, if she’s have kept going after I told her to stop, and hurt me, that’d have been rape.
With normal sexual frequency, especially with long-term partners, or new untested partners you come across a lot of scenarios where the best idea is to stop.