Elizabeth Warren HQ: She's Got A Plan!
- Thread starter King Kreole
- Start date
King Kreole
natural blondie like goku
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I see in his fund raising emails he is saying he will only run if he believes he is the best available candidate. It got me thinking maybe if her or Tulsi get off to a great start he won't run. If they sputter he goes in.
Do you think stuff like campaign people switching teams is a bigger factor?
Depends on if higher folk from 2016 end up migrating and then Bernie is starting from scratch which ain’t a good look
Jhoon
Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Biden has been a politician for over 40 years but he's the populist?Biden is a populist and Warren is a career politician corporate shill....are y'all nikkas even paying attention or are you just here for the free coffee?
storyteller
Superstar
They met less than a month ago. Since then she's brought the pharmaceuticals bill out; announced her run (well basically did); and then picked up a well known former staffer...I'm wondering if they came to an understanding there. That's been the Seder theory since that pharmaceuticals bill dropped but I never bought it; this makes me think twice though.
https://www.albanyherald.com/news/b...cle_51ddf726-39b7-55d3-8a91-524eaac837c4.html
Hillary Clinton spent $370 million more than Trump on the presidential election. Now you tell me, was it effective?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-election-its-a-doozy/?utm_term=.f32168407882
Nate Silver doesn't think it was too effective either.
Have you Heard Nate Silver's Thoughts about Russiagate? He's not a Believer. It's a Math Thing.
How much did Russia spend again? You got receipts?
A Russian troll factory had a $1.25 million monthly budget to interfere in the 2016 US election
Nate Silver has a right to his opinion but that's a pretty huge waste of money by a foreign government if that's the case. Although even Nate Silver kinda backpedaled on this and said he's agnostic about it -
How Much Did Russian Interference Affect The 2016 Election?
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Yeah, spending money proves nothing about influence. Hillary spent more than double than Trump and what 30X more than that Russian entity you posted about but lost? Russia had that much better ad targeting than the Clinton campaign?!
Wow that would make her team a bunch of real dummies.And the Nate Silver article you posted is 9 months before the one I posted. So it's the other way, he has gotten more doubtful over time, he has not backpedaled. Nice try tho.
a million dollars a month?
even you don't believe that's a huge waste of money...for an entire country
just in case the indian dna test didn't dissuade you
What's the fiasco? What's funny about it ?
nothing, manSeems like an attempt to appear relatable and show off her personality and charm that backfired bigly
Thanking her husband for being home?
Its obviously not a major deal and her appeal is in her policies but if this is a glimpse into her campaign then
Yeah, spending money proves nothing about influence. Hillary spent more than double than Trump and what 30X more than that Russian entity you posted about but lost? Russia had that much better ad targeting than the Clinton campaign?!
Why do you keep bringing up Clinton? I have no interest in defending her terrible campaign..but that's not the topic at hand.
Obviously Russia didn't spend as much as one of the major parties, that doesn't somehow negate their influence. Especially with the election being close as it was and them targeting certain demographics in key areas. My point is Russia wouldn't have wasted the money and effort if they didn't think they could sway a significant number of voters.