Affordable is relative to where you live. The rent San Francisco is considerably higher than the rent in Meridian, Mississippi. You can get a whole ass 3 bedroom apartment in Meridian Mississippi for less than $1,000.00. You can get a one bedroom apartment for $700.00.
https://www.apartmentguide.com/apartments/Mississippi/Meridian/Oak-Manor-Apartment-Homes/100016505/
Why are people like you advocating that people try to live in cities that they can not afford? The lady in the story gets disability of around $800.00 per month. She sleeps in her car with a dog in Phoenix, because she can not afford an apartment. What is wrong with me pointing out that her money could go further by moving to a more affordable place in a smaller town like Jackson or Meridian, Mississippi or some of those small towns around those cities?
You all are pie in the sky. You are not practical and are unreasonable. You think that the government can or should step in to fix the problem, but in order to fix the problem of homelessness in the cities the working poor will have to be taxed if the federal government does not step in. A more reasonable solution is that people should move to cities and towns that they can afford to live in. That is not a slap in the face to them. That is reality. If I can not afford to live in a neighborhood in my city then I will have to move to a neighborhood in my city that I can afford or I will have to hit the burbs.