Dude ordered to pay $50,000 for breaking engagement.

Ohnoits

All Star
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
4,007
Reputation
201
Daps
6,329
Reppin
NULL
lol no sympathy...sorry but until they change the law, that is breach of contract, and while some hos will try to take your money, if he legit asked her to quit her job to watch the kids...well... :manny: he conceivably cost her income because she lost years in workforce plus didn't get a marriage out of it.
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
46,646
Reputation
19,791
Daps
187,143
Why is it his responsibility to take care of her after a breakup? It was probably her idea to quit working anyway.

Doesn't matter whose idea it was. They made an agreement that he would work and she would not. He held up that agreement for quite sometime. Now he wants to leave her high and dry without any resourses. How would that be fair? Let me put it to you like this. Do you want him to pay for her and her kids or do you want the system to pay for her?
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,247
Reputation
-13,974
Daps
130,328
Shacking up with a chick you have no intention of marrying is simp like behaviour. Obviously he didn't think she was worthy of marriage yet strung her along. I would've told her to kick rocks years ago and continued to play the field.
I thought simping was being extra nice to a woman to try to get her to like you.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
Now he wants to leave her high and dry without any resourses. How would that be fair?

i'm sorry but how isn't it a fair? she's a grown woman, not a child. equality, equality, equality, until i want some goddamn money off the work of men. if a dude wants to string a chick on, the courts shouldn't financially punish him for it.

but hey, keep up the good work, women. you're basically making it harder on yourselves in the long run
 

Kidd Dibiase

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
70,639
Reputation
9,146
Daps
194,254
after this it's like whats the point in getting married if the court can still treat you like your married simply because you bought her a ring.

this is why Cena is a genius for his cohabitation agreement contract
 

JT-Money

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
11,184
Reputation
3,270
Daps
48,488
Reppin
NULL
Doesn't matter whose idea it was. They made an agreement that he would work and she would not. He held up that agreement for quite sometime. Now he wants to leave her high and dry without any resourses. How would that be fair? Let me put it to you like this. Do you want him to pay for her and her kids or do you want the system to pay for her?

I'm willing to bet she probably hasn't tried to find a job. She just wants this guy to continue subsidizing her lifestyle.

I don't think tax payers should be forced to give her a dime. If you choose to have children but can't take care of them you should suffer the consequences.
 

GoPro

EscoBeard Season Has Returned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,460
Reputation
2,195
Daps
32,090
Reppin
#CertLife #ITGang
It's incredible to me that you're missing the obvious and most appropriate third option here, but I guess that's feminism for ya.
Pardon my appearance of simping, but you act like it'd be easy to find a job with a 10 year gap in employment history and two kids to take care of. Some of you cats take #HOH to the absurd.
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
46,646
Reputation
19,791
Daps
187,143
i'm sorry but how isn't it a fair? she's a grown woman, not a child. equality, equality, equality, until i want some goddamn money off the work of men. if a dude wants to string a chick on, the courts shouldn't financially punish him for it.

but hey, keep up the good work, women. you're basically making it harder on yourselves in the long run

You're right. Her and her children should have no where to go and no food b/c daddy found some new booty.

Throw your kids out on the street brehs
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
You're right. Her and her children should have no where to go and no food b/c daddy found some new booty.

Throw your kids out on the street brehs

how about the spouse that can afford to pay for the kids keeps them? thats fair right? or is fair the man having to come out of his pockets to basically pay for a bum?
 

™BlackPearl The Empress™

Long Live the Empire
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
46,646
Reputation
19,791
Daps
187,143
I'm willing to bet she probably hasn't tried to find a job. She just wants this guy to continue subsidizing her lifestyle.

I don't think tax payers should be forced to give her a dime. If you choose to have children but can't take care of them you should suffer the consequences.

Your right. He had children and decided he wanted their mother to stay at home and raise them so now he has to "suffer the consequences."
 
Top