@ Duck Dynasty sparking this conversation. Good arguments on both sides though....
Duck Dynasty: TV pastor points out demonic nature of homosexuality, liberals foam at mouth..
- Thread starter Hiphoplives4eva
- Start date
@ Duck Dynasty sparking this conversation. Good arguments on both sides though....
Yeah, now you're just bullshytting.
Now you're gonna tell me the bible doesn't prescribe how to manage slaves.
who said I'm a gay liberal crusader?
Couldn't help it that the gay liberal crusaders decided to tag team me in an attempt to troll the thread to oblivion. Gladly, quality posters stepped in to engender quality debate.
I'm actually proud of Higher learning for a change.
you just say dumb shyt and wanna again talk about "free speech" as if talking shyt about coworkers AND your customers (audience) is a reason for your employer continuing to employ you.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 44,653
- Reputation
- 8,104
- Daps
- 121,504
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
The text actually proves what I'm saying is true:
Leviticus 20:13
וְאִ֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִשְׁכַּ֤ב אֶת־זָכָר֙ מִשְׁכְּבֵ֣י אִשָּׁ֔ה תֹּועֵבָ֥ה עָשׂ֖וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֑ם מֹ֥ות יוּמָ֖תוּ דְּמֵיהֶ֥ם בָּֽם
From right-to-left.....
and a man - if - lies - with - mankind - as those who lie - with a woman - an abomination - have committed - both - they shall surely - be put to death - their blood - [is] on them
There is NO equivalent punishment for eating shellfish, therefore, they are NOT equivalent transgressions.
Keep using very old atheist talking-points that have been demolished because you haven't read what the text actually states, brehs.
Leviticus 20:13
וְאִ֗ישׁ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִשְׁכַּ֤ב אֶת־זָכָר֙ מִשְׁכְּבֵ֣י אִשָּׁ֔ה תֹּועֵבָ֥ה עָשׂ֖וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֑ם מֹ֥ות יוּמָ֖תוּ דְּמֵיהֶ֥ם בָּֽם
From right-to-left.....
and a man - if - lies - with - mankind - as those who lie - with a woman - an abomination - have committed - both - they shall surely - be put to death - their blood - [is] on them
There is NO equivalent punishment for eating shellfish, therefore, they are NOT equivalent transgressions.
Keep using very old atheist talking-points that have been demolished because you haven't read what the text actually states, brehs.
Last edited:
Good arguments on both sides though....
I agree, it's sad that what should basically be a minor story has ended up becoming emblematic for this whole conversation. Liberals are getting way too mad (especially about the gay comments) while the Repubs/Fox News are in full faux-outrage mode, pretending like his network legally putting him on the bench is some grand injustice against free speech (while they simultaneously crusade against free speech in other areas.)
At the end of the day, though, hopefully people at least learn more about these issues from it.
Piff Perkins
Veteran
Nothing more needs to be said.
Anyone who has a job....if you went to work and started saying ignorant shyt out loud about gay people, black people, Jews, etc in front of clients, customers, managers, etc...you'd get fired. Even if you tried to defend it on religious grounds it wouldn't matter. That's reality.
These people aren't dumb enough not to know this. In fact, the very people promoting this nonsense work in television and radio media - anyone think they don't know about contracts that can be terminated if you say ignorant shyt? Yall think Sean Hannity isn't familiar with that? He knows exactly why Phil got canned, and would likely get suspended if he made similar comments. This is all a passive aggressive game for bigots to sit around and hand wring over losing the ability to denigrate those they hate without consequence.
sums it up
I don't see the connection... in that clip, a gay dude who is being inappropriately explicit and annoying is sonned by a gay dude who isn't. In real life, some gays and liberals got mad that a Conservative Christian compared them to thieves, murderers, and goatfukkers.
i just thought the video was funny.
Plus it's funny when liberals act like gays are oppressed.
They don't have the same economic rights as straight people on a national level, they get discriminated against in the job market, the housing market, and healthcare. That's enough for me to consider them an oppressed group.
They are barely discriminated against in the job market...and not more than any other group who isn't white men. Plus gay black men are more represented than str8 black men in corp environments.
On a federal level... who cares what gays think?... If they wanted health rights, death rights, tax etc.... they would increase the scope of civil unions and fight the easy fight. That's y that video is appropriate. They mainly want acceptance NOT rights. That's y they have the struggle because acceptance isn't a legal issue. Most humans will never be supportive of sexual mental defects or gay lifestyles... it's just what it is.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,805
- Daps
- 152,087
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
So essentially in your world a public figure can't say anything that could be possibly offensive to anyone within earshot, either immediately in the perpetrators vicinity or on the world wide web, at risk of losing his or her livelihood.
Got it.
It appears the liberal paradise isn't so liberal or progressive afterall.
Yep. Too bad.
He said it to a major publication and thought we wanted to hear it.
He can repeat all that shyt he wants on sundays when he's at church since he's got some free time on his hands.
They dont' HAVE to employ you.
Without marriage, they have no way of being eligible for certain tax modifications, inheritance, insurance policies, etc. Those are the economic inequalities I'm referring to. Straight couples have the ability to be eligible for those and incorporate those important capacities into their life plans. Taxes, insurance, and inheritance, to use just three examples, aren't insignificant.