They did, but it wasn't because of Boogie dominating Draymond, because that didn't happen. They lost mostly because Durant couldn't get it going on offense.Kings won the game.... nuff said
They did, but it wasn't because of Boogie dominating Draymond, because that didn't happen. They lost mostly because Durant couldn't get it going on offense.Kings won the game.... nuff said
Green can't guard big back to the basket big men. Green certainly cannot guard iverson
Let's ask green to score 20 every night and guard like he does now
Draymond certainly cannot guard pgs full court basically all game long throughout a series.
Cousins dropped 32 that game though and i'm pretty sure every single possession in overtime he shot the ball no joke...ended up winning because of him basically cuz he dominated in OT. Dray got workedThey did, but it wasn't because of Boogie dominating Draymond, because that didn't happen. They lost mostly because Durant couldn't get it going on offense.
In certain areas he definitely was. One of the best perimeter defenders all throughout the 00s - had more defensive impact than any other player on those Indiana squads by a good margin. However, he isn't fukking with Draymond as a rim protector and his ability to anchor the paint, which is the most important and influential aspect of defensive play. Have you seen any of the data I posted in this thread:Call me crazy but I think Ron arrest was just as good as dray
It's not an excuse. It's the reality of the situation. Why would Draymond guard the best wing every night when the Wariors need him to anchor the paint/protect the rim and blow up PnR activity? Why would the Warriors take him out of his normal freelance role and have him guard one perimeter player all game? Who would fulfill all his other defensive roles with the same effectiveness? Have you been paying attention to anything I've said in this thread? You know what I'm saying makes sense - you don't always have to cut off your nose to spite your face when it comes to my posts. See -But if that's gonna be your excuse for every time Draymond doesnt guard the other team's best player, then that claim doesnt actually mean much (if it were true, which it isnt.)
Tell me, would all those late-00s Celtics squads be just as effective on defense if KG guarded the best wing player every night and did little else on defense?I don't see how folk are askng why didn't Draymond guard LeBron. It's the same/similar reason KG/Duncan were never the primary defenders on LeBron. It's the same/similar reason why every big man anchor doesn't defend LeBron. Are we forgetting how many roles Draymond has on the defensive end that puts the Warriors in position of having an elite defense:
Guarding the low/high post - against legit big men
Anchoring the paint/defense (communicating where every player needs to be)
Providing help defense all over the floor
Protecting the rim
Switching onto positions 1-5, ball handlers and covering up defensive miscues
Shutting down the PNR/PNR and all activity around screens/pindowns
Guarding stretch bigs and post bigs
Able to defend every shot in any situation possible
Crashing the glass, boxing out big men
Dudes want Draymond to forego all of those roles and just simply have him guard one player. Imagine just how less effective the Warriors defense would be if all he did was guard one player. It's the equivalent of having a freak and the only sexual activity y'all doing is missionary with your clothes on.
And what do your eyes tell you?nikka we have fukking eyes
Even if that were to be true, don't you think that would make Draymond's impact even more impressive due to the fact he has to guard players/teams that save all their energy for offense?The best defender in an era were nobody plays defense
Chris Paul could average 35 points a night if he wanted, but why would he when the Clippers need him to distribute, set the pace, run the offense and get everyone involved? Anyway, hes still a 35pt a night scorer.It's not an excuse. It's the reality of the situation. Why would Draymond guard the best wing every night when the Wariors need him to anchor the paint/protect the rim and blow up PnR activity?
That's not what I'm doing with Draymond. And no that analogy doesn't make one bit of sense whatsoever - never mind the fact that setting the pace, running the offense and getting everyone involved is all the same shyt; that doesn't stop him from also putting up points. His reluctancy to score stops him from putting up points. Westbrook is doing all that shyt right now: scoring at a high level, while also running the offense and getting everyone involved. In fact Draymond is basically doing what Westbrook does offensively, on defense, except he does it effectively - defends more total shots than any other player (holding players to -6.1% under their usual FG%), defends more iso posessions than any other player (holds players to 30% shooting, better rate than the entire league) defends more post-ups than 99% of the league (holds players to 31.9% shooting, better rate than the entire league), defends more spot up attempts than the majority of the league (holds players to 37% shooting, a better rate than 90% of the league), protects the rim at an elite level, anchors the paint, covers up defensive mistakes, provides help defense, blows up all PnR activity, runs the defense by telling players where they need to be, sets box score records for blocks/steals - the list goes on. He has the biggest defensive workload in the league.Chris Paul could average 35 points a night if he wanted, but why would he when the Clippers need him to distribute, set the pace, run the offense and get everyone involved? Anyway, hes still a 35pt a night scorer.
^ This is what you're doing with Draymond
a better analogy would be like asking
an all pro safety....ed reed, polamalu for example....to stop flying all over the field and making plays no matter where they happen to be ...and force him to cover 1 reciever the entire game.
that limits his ball hawking skill, his ability to cause havoc in the back field with an occasional blitz...helping actual corners over the top...just making plays overall...because you want them stuck in one area.
it's severely limiting his defensive skillset.
he's the spine of that defense.
Yeah, definitely a more appropriate analogy. My mind was in the gutter when I made that post. He's basically the Ray Lewis of the NBA: the passion, energy, work ethic, playing above his height/weight, Mensa IQ, versatility (defending all positions, in any situation) and revolutionized his position and the game from a defensive standpoint.
For all the 33+ posters that dapped this, can any of y'all state Kawhi's case for being a better defender?Not even better than kawhi defensively
I. Rim protection/anchoring the paint is one of, if not the most important aspect of defense - this applies to all erasrodman wasn't a great rim protector. and you could argue that defensively he had two separate windows: first as a perimeter defender, then when he filled out, as a post defender. but he was elite in both areas. i just dont see how dray is already a better, more accomplished defender than a two-time defensive player of the year.
And that's half the reason why he's the better defender. He's elite at practicaly every single aspect of defensive play.more versatile? sure.