etrofllenrod504
All Star
Why tho?Lakers better make the playoffs, and I ain't talkin about that play-in shyt either.
![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54117/54117ef429724d5e5d426835ebd427f4fdc14392" alt="Thinking face :thinking: 🤔"
Why tho?Lakers better make the playoffs, and I ain't talkin about that play-in shyt either.
![]()
What can he do that MJ cannot?I agree Bron >MJ
Just can do more on the court
What can he do that MJ cannot?
Wilt.MJ was amazing but there is no NBA equivalent to a Gretzky or a Pele.
Wtf are you talkin about?Win more than lose in the finals as a #1 option
Wtf are you talkin about?![]()
oh ok lolsorry breh I misread your post
Correct me if I’m wrong, but in order for Apple to become what it became didn’t it need developers that were exceptionally talented enough for the level of R&D required to rapidly advance the technology to a point where much of the modern tech of Apple could be made?
I could be wrong, but I would think it would take an amazing talent breaking the mold in the past to make Apple what it is today.
Either way, basketball fans would’ve been better off ranking things by generation instead of this bullshyt. Bron gets under appreciated and MJ gets looked at as some generational barrier to the validation we want to give todays players.
Holy shyt... I never looked at it this way. This is fukkin crazy.Its hard to make a convincing argument for a guy who is an entire hall of fame career ahead of the other guy , whilst doing it in a much tougher, more physical era.
Lebron is 6'8 260 and has good ball skills. He's a really good player. He's supposed to dominate in the no-touch era. Jordan would have laid waste and seige to this powder puff era.
![]()
And contrary to Draymond, I'm not an "old-head". I'll be 30 next year. But most of the younger fans can know who the GOAT is.