Draymond Green wants a max extension of 4-years $138M from Warriors

Does Green get a MAX?


  • Total voters
    153

Goat poster

KANG LIFE
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
19,217
Reputation
3,228
Daps
82,895
:russ:


We’ve never seen Steph without Draymond. So that’s a bit of causation. You shouldn’t asusme just bc Draymond been there, that Steph’s success is because of him. Could quite literally be the opposite: Steph is that successful in spite of Draymond.

Also looking at on/off splits doesn’t answer things bc Draymond is on thr team and their gameplan is incorporating him. Can’t just remove him mid season and not expect slippage. However if he’s let go in the off-season and they have time to chose a different way of doing things? Forget about it it. They don’t need that ngga. Considering ALL the talent they have, id make an argument they get better with the better floor spacing.
I’m just gonna point out that I NEVER said Steph is successful because of Draymond.

He’d be an all nba guy regardless

Basketball at its highest levels is a TEAM game though

And all the data suggests the Warriors don’t win as much without a focused Dray

None of the players you named are good facilitators , that’s just not something everyone does naturally

For as good as a finals he had Wiggins could NOT do what Dray does for them.
 
Last edited:

daboywonder2002

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
12,867
Reputation
975
Daps
27,033
Reppin
minnesota
Warriors gonna do the same thing the Suns did with Ayton. If you think you're worth a max, test the market, get your best offer and if it's fair, we'll match.
 

OnFleekTing

Superstar
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
4,789
Reputation
95
Daps
20,417
Reppin
DMV
Draymond is washed
He needs to be happy that he plays in a system that fits him so perfectly because his stat line is pathetic
If he wasn't winning on the warriors he'd be out the league by now imo
 

VegetasHairline

Veteran
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
35,204
Reputation
11,540
Daps
144,372
Reppin
CACS
:russ:


We’ve never seen Steph without Draymond. So that’s a bit of causation. You shouldn’t asusme just bc Draymond been there, that Steph’s success is because of him. Could quite literally be the opposite: Steph is that successful in spite of Draymond.

Also looking at on/off splits doesn’t answer things bc Draymond is on thr team and their gameplan is incorporating him. Can’t just remove him mid season and not expect slippage. However if he’s let go in the off-season and they have time to chose a different way of doing things? Forget about it it. They don’t need that ngga. Considering ALL the talent they have, id make an argument they get better with the better floor spacing.
There's two sides to the game. They're a top defense because of Draymond. Neither Wiggins or Kuminga is replacing what Draymond brings on the defensive end. He may not be what he used to be on that end but he's still a great defender. His passing also allows Steph to play off the ball so much.
 

SunnyD

All Star
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Messages
1,292
Reputation
523
Daps
7,194
If nothing else you have to respect his confidence. He’s aiming high. Not sure he’ll get it. It’s likely that both sides will meet somewhere in the middle. I can’t see them wanting to pay him that much but I also don’t see them just letting him go.
 

T.he I.nformant

1st Ballot HOF Teller
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
11,947
Reputation
2,515
Daps
39,401
Reppin
Wherever nikkas need to be told on
I don't think they'll reach that number but they'll give him more than anyone else would as a lifetime achievement act. It's not gonna be a difficult negotiation unless Dray gets in his feelings and decides to take way less money elsewhere because of pride (he won't).

Klay's the extension that will actually be interesting, he'll actually have suitors ready to over pay and force their hand.
I could see Klay agreeing to a team-friendly deal. He ain’t trying to leave Steph and this is a team that stuck with him and gave him a max deal after he tore his ACL. You don’t see that kind of commitment from teams every day. They could have justifiably offered less but they didn’t. It’s clear that meant something to Klay judging by his speech the other day. My money is he would take less to keep the band together. Same with Dray.
 

Braman

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,219
Reputation
2,787
Daps
53,331
There's two sides to the game. They're a top defense because of Draymond. Neither Wiggins or Kuminga is replacing what Draymond brings on the defensive end. He may not be what he used to be on that end but he's still a great defender. His passing also allows Steph to play off the ball so much.
No doubt…but it ain’t worth THAT much. It also the most replaceable asset of the pending big money assets:

-Can’t lose Klay’s shooting…plus at a more scarce position like 3&D

-Can’t lose wiggins who also a 3&D and will increase value the older klay gets. He’s already their top defender. Lol @ everybody giving Draymond the credit when wiggins is tasked with the top wing and most elite guys are wings.

Your KD, Boooker, Ja, Harden…wherever they gotta get to, that’s gon be wiggins they relying on as the primary defender, not Draymond who’s just help. It was wiggins who put JAYSON TATUM in clamps, not Draymond. And he’s 28. You’re not giving him up

-Poole you can argue is a luxury but I’m very high on him, plus he’s 22. Would be foolish to let him walk for Draymond

You can EASILY replace a Draymond. Again just bc they’ve played thru Draymond doesn’t mean they need to. Seems like ages ago but you’ll recall when GS first started to bubble, 2 forgotten men on that team were David Lee and jarret Jack. Jack came off the bench and was 2nd on the team in assists. Lee was a passing high ig big and was 3rd on the team in assists. Draymond wasn’t even in the rotation yet. They don’t need Draymond bruh
 

Two Stacks

New Orleans Shoe Lover
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
13,545
Reputation
1,086
Daps
17,530
Reppin
New Orleans, Louisiana
both Dray and Klay deals are up at the same time (2024). can they afford to max them both out? Which they will have to do? :picard:

Imagine if GSW wins another title this season or next? Then Wiggins...and you know Poole gonna want 100-125 mill minimum
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
43,783
Reputation
268
Daps
123,854
This'll be difficult for Warriors land.

Do you keep the big 3? Do you let one of them go?

They might view Klay as more expendable since the team was still good without him for most of the year. As where they were up and down without Draymond.



Yeah it seems inevitable that either Klay or Draymond will be gone.



Most likely Klay
 

DlAMONDZ

That pu$$y got me grinning
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Messages
7,927
Reputation
-1,110
Daps
32,329
Reppin
Cali
you dont max a guy bc he's "important to what your team does"

Ayton is integral to the Suns. He's not worth the max. Same deal here
Ayton bring nothing special to the table. Dray does. He's still amazing defensively. 2 bad games in the finals doesn't change that
 

Don Homer

Molto Bene
Supporter
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
30,489
Reputation
4,401
Daps
103,005
Ayton bring nothing special to the table. Dray does. He's still amazing defensively. 2 bad games in the finals doesn't change that
It wasn’t just the finals. And he wasn’t good in 3/6 finals

He was mediocre in Memphis and average in Dallas

And Draymond flat out isn’t worth a max contract. A max player’s team doesn’t look good when he sits/gets benched/fouls out. That happened multiple times vs Memphis and Dallas.
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
47,478
Reputation
6,531
Daps
132,035
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
Draymond is already in his 30s. It doesn't make sense to extend him now. If it is I would do maybe a 3 years 105 million extension.
 
Top