The Prince of All Saiyans
Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
No Mention of a Good Day to Die Hard?
Nope not for my money.No Mention of a Good Day to Die Hard?
I just brought this thread up cause my uncle turned that movie on last nightNope not for my money.
A Good Day to Die Hard was the only Die Hard movie to be written as a "Die Hard" movie. That's why it's trash. All the other Die Hards were based on novels or articles, which happened to be turned into Die Hard movies. It couldn't learn from Under Siege, Cliffhanger or Speed, which were movies written to be Die Hard movies with different characters, which were actually good Die Hard movies and good movies. In conclusion, Die Hard.Nope not for my money.
I don’t even think that’s why. I think it doesn’t work because like damn near every movie after part 1, excluding part 3, it treats john like a superhero. He’s not. The appeal of john is he’s a regular guy who has the worst luck. He’s a straight up superhero in 2, 4 and 5. But more so 5 than any others. And that makes everything less. The action is less. The drama is less. The tension is less. Because mcclane is impervious to harm and invincibleA Good Day to Die Hard was the only Die Hard movie to be written as a "Die Hard" movie. That's why it's trash. All the other Die Hards were based on novels or articles, which happened to be turned into Die Hard movies. It couldn't learn from Under Siege, Cliffhanger or Speed, which were movies written to be Die Hard movies with different characters, which were actually good Die Hard movies and good movies. In conclusion, Die Hard.
That's the argument Michael Scott made in an episode of The Office. I still think 2 and Live Free or Die Hard are good movies. A Good Day to Die Hard is a terrible Die Hard movie and a movie at best. There was nothing "good" about it. That title was a misnomer.I don’t even think that’s why. I think it doesn’t work because like damn near every movie after part 1, excluding part 3, it treats john like a superhero. He’s not. The appeal of john is he’s a regular guy who has the worst luck. He’s a straight up superhero in 2, 4 and 5. But more so 5 than any others. And that makes everything less. The action is less. The drama is less. The tension is less. Because mcclane is impervious to harm and invincible
Live free or die hard was fukking horrible. I was done with McClane forever after this stupid ass sceneThat's the argument Michael Scott made in an episode of The Office. I still think 2 and Live Free or Die Hard are good movies. A Good Day to Die Hard is a terrible Die Hard movie and a movie at best. There was nothing "good" about it. That title was a misnomer.
Live free or die hard was fukking horrible. I was done with McClane forever after this stupid ass scene
Yeah I feel Michael lol. The shyt just doesn’t work the more Superman he is. And it seems like John McTiernan is the only director who understands thatThat's the argument Michael Scott made in an episode of The Office. I still think 2 and Live Free or Die Hard are good movies. A Good Day to Die Hard is a terrible Die Hard movie and a movie at best. There was nothing "good" about it. That title was a misnomer.
If I ever got to make an action movie, I always wanted McTiernan to do it. I feel like he got one more great movie in him. He did his lil bid and is prolly cheap to get and is looking for redemption.Yeah I feel Michael lol. The shyt just doesn’t work the more Superman he is. And it seems like John McTiernan is the only director who understands that