Did you know that a 9th century Arab wrote a book entitled "The Superiority of Blacks over Whites"?

Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,821
Daps
84,254
Reppin
NULL
This is simply not true.

Actually it is. Educate yourself. Read here about the Mamluks: Mamluk - Wikipedia

The word Mamluk is Arabic for slave. It was used to describe Muslims of slave origin. And the mark of slave origin at that time was white skin. If you've seen any image of a Mamluk it's that of a white person. This is in direct contrast to the Arabs who at that time were defined by their black skin. And in most pictures were depicted as being black.

Here is a picture that shows what I'm saying:

AMamelukeonhorsebackwithaPitonorfoo.jpg


The description below describes the two white individuals in this picture as Mamluks while it describes the black man as a "Bedouin". Bedouin was a term used to describe the pure Arab desert dweller.

The painter of the this picture is clearly telling us that pure Arabs (aka Bedouins) were of a different race than the people called Mamluks. The Mamluks were white while the pure Arab was black.
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,301
Reputation
7,105
Daps
109,647
Yup. Al-Jahiz was a black Arab but at that time in Iraq, there was a lot of discrimination against a people called "the Zanj." They were black people from what are today countries in Southeast Africa like Mozambique. In Iraq around that time there was actually a huge slave revolt by the Zanj.

Al-Jahiz wrote that book to counter the racism he saw coming from white Muslims like the Persians against these group of black people called the Zanj. It should be noted that although Al-Jahiz was black, he was not a Zanj. He was an Arab. If you read the book he will say a lot of the time "they say" as an illusion to the fact this is what the Zanj say about blackness rather than his own thoughts.

Its an interesting look into race in 9th century Iraq.
Every source I've found so far has an argument specifying that the Zanj Revolt was not a slave revolt.
It doesn't look like there are any good translations of the book as a whole, or even as a part.
 

Claudex

Lord have mercy!
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
6,175
Reputation
3,718
Daps
18,495
Reppin
Motherland
:snoop:

That blog post is so full of inaccuracies and outright lies.

"just as the carriers of black (Abbasid) inspire more fear and fill up more the heart than the carriers of white (Umayyad)"

Abbasids weren't black and Umayyads weren't white either, both of them were arab Qureishis and they were both related by blood and marriage.

I knew something was wrong when I saw China (:mindblown:) there in the middle of a prose about blackness.:what:
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
545
Reputation
-20
Daps
554
:snoop:

That blog post is so full of inaccuracies and outright lies.

"just as the carriers of black (Abbasid) inspire more fear and fill up more the heart than the carriers of white (Umayyad)"

Abbasids weren't black and Umayyads weren't white either, both of them were arab Qureishis and they were both related by blood and marriage.
The Abbasid flag was black
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
24,772
Reputation
3,224
Daps
55,724
I heard about this Mamluk, gotta do some more research on it
 

flo

All Star
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
3,136
Reputation
230
Daps
8,001
Reppin
NULL
The concept of "black" and "white" didn't even exist back than...
 

AndroidHero

Superstar
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
6,618
Reputation
1,220
Daps
39,135
The concept of "black" and "white" didn't even exist back than...


Mohammed said this:

"There is no superiority for an Arab over a non-Arab, nor for a non-Arab over an Arab. Neither is the white superior over the black, nor is the black superior over the white -- except by piety."

So the concept of white and black cleary existed back then.
 
Last edited:

AndroidHero

Superstar
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
6,618
Reputation
1,220
Daps
39,135
I knew something was wrong when I saw China (:mindblown:) there in the middle of a prose about blackness.:what:

"the blacks include the Zanj, Ethiopians, the people of Fazzan, the Berbers, the Copts, and Nubians, the people of Zaghawa, Marw, Sind and India, Qamar and Dabila, China, and Masin"


Yeah, since when were the Chinese black.


:mindblown:

And who are the Qamar, Dabila, Mason, Marwa and sind people? I googled them and I couldn't find anything.
 

ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA

Return of the Khryst
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
76,855
Reputation
9,099
Daps
117,752
Reppin
ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA
"the blacks include the Zanj, Ethiopians, the people of Fazzan, the Berbers, the Copts, and Nubians, the people of Zaghawa, Marw, Sind and India, Qamar and Dabila, China, and Masin"


Yeah, since when were the Chinese black.


:mindblown:

And who are the Qamar, Dabila, Mason, Marwa and sind people? I googled them and I couldn't find anything.
Old terms (old arabic) for empires, surely.
Sind is a province now in Pakistan.
Marwa is Somali.
 
Top