Did slave breeding actually exist?

[Professor Emeritus]

http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/enslavement/text6/masterslavesexualabuse.pdf

the torture and rape of black women was the lifeblood of this country dummy. talking about asian elephants? wtf?

Hell yeah slaveowners abused their female slaves. Slaveowners were moral degenerates at many levels.

What the fukk that has to do with selective breeding or Asian elephants, I have no idea.

Other posters in this thread have been talking about horses or dogs. Both of those are poor analogies, because they grow up in a couple years. Elephants are a far more accurate analogy, and show why the whole idea doesn't work.

 

[-----]

http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/enslavement/text6/masterslavesexualabuse.pdf

the torture and rape of black women was the lifeblood of this country dummy. talking about asian elephants? wtf?

Not exactly. The institution of slavery was the ECONOMIC lifes blood of this country. Not some investment rap and torturing black women.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Darwin published his theory in 1859. Slavery in the US ended in 1864

"The Origin of Species" published in 1859 doesn't use the word "evolution" once.

Charles Darwin first used the word "evolution" in his book "The Descent of Man", published in 1871. That's the book that actually deals with the evolution of man. He then added the word "evolution" in when he edited the 6th edition of "The Origin of the Species" in 1872.

Whether you want to count 1859 or 1871, it's quite clear that it was far too late to have shyt to do with selective breeding by slaveholders. No way that freaking Southern slaveowners in the middle of the Civil War knew shyt about some British biologist's complex scientific theories about finches and geological strata and then retroactively applied it to their slaves.

 

[miranda]

Hell yeah slaveowners abused their female slaves. Slaveowners were moral degenerates at many levels.

What the fukk that has to do with selective breeding or Asian elephants, I have no idea.

I take it you didn't read my link, multiple slave narratives detailing women being forced to have children by whatever black man the master chose, black men being used as studs.

 

[-----]

I take it you didn't read my link, multiple slave narratives detailing women being forced to have children by whatever black man the master chose, black men being used as studs.

You act as if the black man was winning in any these senarios.

 

[YeLovesBoston]

"The Origin of Species" published in 1859 doesn't use the word "evolution" once.

Charles Darwin first used the word "evolution" in his book "The Descent of Man", published in 1871. That's the book that actually deals with the evolution of man. He then added the word "evolution" in when he edited the 6th edition of "The Origin of the Species" in 1872.

Whether you want to count 1859 or 1871, it's quite clear that it was far too late to have shyt to do with selective breeding by slaveholders. No way that freaking Southern slaveowners in the middle of the Civil War knew shyt about some British biologist's complex scientific theories about finches and geological strata and then retroactively applied it to their slaves.

but the theory was presented in the book. And probably not. But the theory was there

 

[miranda]

so youre on your black militant steeze today, and not the pimp hand strong steeze? ok cool cool

You act as if the black man was winning in any these senarios.

im not trying to turn a slavery discussion thread into a gendr war thread. didn't mean for it to come off that way. i apologize

 

[Ronnie Lott]

No, there was never any slave breeding.

Natural selection happened by those surviving the boat ride, and the harsh conditions of slavery alone. There is no documentation of 'forced breeding'.

Some silly myth people just ran with, like 'cracker' meaning crack of the whip, or asians eating babies. None of these things are true in the slightest and if people did any research instead of playing telephone and regurgitating shyt they 'hear' they'd realize it.

The sheer ignorance of the above post is laughable

You couldn't be more off base

 

[-----]

so youre on your black militant steeze today, and not the pimp hand strong steeze? ok cool cool



im not trying to turn a slavery discussion thread into a gendr war thread. didn't mean for it to come off that way. i apologize

You got me pegged wrong sisters.

 

[shopthatwrecks]

yep...u work side by side with a nikka for so long..n ya family is literally broken .

u n that nikka fukkin...n addin on to the plantations

 

[miranda]

You got me pegged wrong sisters.

i have no idea what youre saying

 

[John Mayer]

You act as if the black man was winning in any these senarios.

I wouldn't take her serious on the topic of slavery breh this is the same woman who dropped this gem right here..

black men do have something to offer, they are sexually attractive and have nice voices,
thats about it.

socially and financially they cant compete with white men

 

[-----]

I wouldn't take her serious on the topic of slavery breh this is the same woman who dropped this gem right here..

Yeah thanks. Ill probably just put her on ignore.

 

[miranda]

I wouldn't take her serious on the topic of slavery breh this is the same woman who dropped this gem right here..

how many of you have this quote bookmarked? that thread was bushed like 10 minutes after it was posted.

and did you not see

im not trying to turn a slavery discussion thread into a gendr war thread. didn't mean for it to come off that way. i apologize

 

[How Sway?]

I didn't say they died because of slavery don't be a moron. I said native Americans weren't used for slaves because they were physically inferior. Ive done more research on this than you, don't try to out smart me.