Only thing that did was increase the dikk size among slave descendents, slaves were picked from Africa because african blacks had the genetic potential to be incredibly efficient laborers in a tropical environment where CACs would quickly get skin cancer and diseases.
Did slave breeding actually exist?
- Thread starter -----
- Start date
ShenJingPoQi
All Star
cacs always want to take credit for something yall aint do nothing this God gift but what I do give cacs credit for is destruction killings and building a system for minorities to fail 
Mr.Big Meat McGee
All Star
Black people are just stronger in general. We higher bone density than other races, more fast twitch fibers, fastest runners, sun endurance etc
Cabbage Patch
The Media scene in V is for Vendetta is the clue
This is the answer, and yes it happened.
Cabbage Patch
The Media scene in V is for Vendetta is the clue
We're in a thread about slavery. Humans were debased. Connect the dots.Where have people been breeding human beings for hundreds of years...? and the fact you debase humans to that of a Jack Russell or Bull Terrier....
Breeding plantations were a reality during slavery. The male slaves to breed were called studs not Bucks,bucks meant youngings.These plantations made for breeding were called breeding plantations.
Its a fact many slaves did not survive after 5 years.Thats why there was a constant supply of slaves from Africa because there was a high mortality right on the plantation. The average life for a slave in America was 5 years for some reason.
Its a fact many slaves did not survive after 5 years.Thats why there was a constant supply of slaves from Africa because there was a high mortality right on the plantation. The average life for a slave in America was 5 years for some reason.
Last edited:
mortuus est
Veteran
sooo in this thread we black people are baiscally the xmen? got it
PortCityProphet
Follow me to the truth
They'd buy the biggest slaves possible man and woman for working purposes so yea they bred them both knowingly and unknowingly. If you got nothing but some big Africans they're going to eventually mate
Uh, no, Darwin's theory of evolution didn't even come out until after slavery ended.
Theories of Evolution we there infancy back then. However people did know how to breed horse and livestock. The question is how much of this was actually applied to slavery.
Every species of horse/livestock that's selectively bred is one that matures in just a few years.
The problem with humans is that it takes 15 years to mature. Average slaveowner probably has his slaves for 30-40 years at most...that's only 2 generations. They ain't going to be thinking about possibly having a better slave 50 years from now when they ready to die. Greedy b*stards aren't planning ahead thinking about their great-great-grandchildren like all that.
In India and Thailand, they've been using elephants for thousands of years. Yet Asian Elephants used for work in Asia are EXACTLY the same as Asian Elephants in the wild. They've never been selectively bred for any useful traits because it just takes them too fukking long to grow up. It's easier to just take what's available - no one is going to do a bunch of work for 50 years just in the "hope" that you might get a slightly better product by the time you're dead.
Exactly. It probably happened here or there, but made shyt nothing of a difference.
This is just ridiculous. American science was way ahead of the rest of the world in the 1700s and early 1800s? What have you been smoking? Do you think that Newton, Volta, Watt, Dalton, Anders, or Darwin were Americans? And America wasn't a "superpower" until long after slavery was over.
Europe, especially England and Germany and to some extent Italy, was easily the center of the scientific world from the beginning of the scientific revolution all the way into the early 1900s. Even in the late 1800s, well after slavery was over, most of the greatest American scientists (Alexander Graham Bell, Nicolai Tesla) were immigrants who had been trained in Europe first. Hell, the Manhattan Project in the 1940s was 70-80% immigrants at the top levels. America has only very, very recently emerged as a scientific power.
And that wiki article was one of the most useless ones I've seen. There was exactly ONE quote from a slave claiming that selective breeding happened, and ONE historian vouching for it, while TWO historians were quoted arguing against it. Not exactly a case for some advanced, long-term selective breeding program.
Slave owners cared about numbers far more than some pie-in-the-sky idea of genetic improvements hundreds of years in the future.
Tommy Knocks
retired
No, there was never any slave breeding.
Natural selection happened by those surviving the boat ride, and the harsh conditions of slavery alone. There is no documentation of 'forced breeding'.
Some silly myth people just ran with, like 'cracker' meaning crack of the whip, or asians eating babies. None of these things are true in the slightest and if people did any research instead of playing telephone and regurgitating shyt they 'hear' they'd realize it.
Natural selection happened by those surviving the boat ride, and the harsh conditions of slavery alone. There is no documentation of 'forced breeding'.
Some silly myth people just ran with, like 'cracker' meaning crack of the whip, or asians eating babies. None of these things are true in the slightest and if people did any research instead of playing telephone and regurgitating shyt they 'hear' they'd realize it.
Only cacs believe that blacks have fast twitching muscles.
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/enslavement/text6/masterslavesexualabuse.pdf
the torture and rape of black women was the lifeblood of this country dummy. talking about asian elephants? wtf?
