Did slave breeding actually exist?

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,668
Reputation
3,859
Daps
80,165
Reppin
NULL
:snoop::snoop:Good job ignoring that you need wealth inorder to take advantage of opportunities during wars and obtain lands over sea

Do you know how the US mostly benefited from WWI, WWII and a few other wars?
the Industrial revolution was spearheaded by wealthy NORTHERNERS. Most of the Robber barons of the 19th century were Northern Elites.

Yes there were wealthy Southerners who Parlayed into industry but that was childs play compared to what was going on in the North and the West!!

As far as the Atomic bomb...Im pretty sure taxpayers are the ones who fund the Department of Defense(FKA the Department of War before the ending of WWII)....
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-564
Daps
15,341
Reppin
WestMidWest
the Industrial revolution was spearheaded by wealthy NORTHERNERS. Most of the Robber barons of the 19th century were Northern Elites.

Yes there were wealthy Southerners who Parlayed into industry but that was childs play compared to what was going on in the North and the West!!

As far as the Atomic bomb...Im pretty sure taxpayers are the ones who fund the Department of Defense(FKA the Department of War before the ending of WWII)....
so like I said, wealth begets wealth
Not sure why you are trying to gain by down playing the impact of slavery on the wealth of the US, but it reeks of intellectual dishonesty

The south was willing to secede from the Union because slavery was very profitable

Focusing on one period of wealth building, while ignoring or downplaying the previous period is ridiculous. Especially when you proceed to factor into how the industrial period contributed to the wealth building of future wealth building periods

Again, Do you know how the US mostly benefited from WWI, WWII and a few other wars?
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,668
Reputation
3,859
Daps
80,165
Reppin
NULL
Ugly ass darkskinned nikkas trying to link up with West Africans who look down upon them anyway...and bleach their skins to look like us...who hate cacs. You're a moron.
Just like clock work
Light skin dudes always show their true colors during time like these man :skip:
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
20,364
Reputation
6,335
Daps
101,063
i dont think they bred any super negroes, i think they were bred for numbers and some trying to create better slaves
they did alot of evil things during slavery, deranged slave masters forcing slaves to breed, thinking they would get bigger slaves isn't outlandish to me, idk why we're applying being knowledgeable of genetics to these people

These type of threads are so crazy. There may have been instances of slave breeding, but common sense says that it wasn't wide spread if it existed at all. Some people are looking at stuff like athletic ability or size as proof that this breeding existed. That is a really stupid notion when you consider that slavery also existed in the Northern States until it died out; but the Black people in the North are just as big and as athletic as Black people in the South. And then there are the Jamaicans who are just as big and as athletic. The Bahamians are just as big and as athletic. Same for the Cubans; Virgin Islanders; Haitians, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, etc. They are all just as big and as athletic as African Americans.

What makes more sense is that Africans are from different ethnic groups. The slaves that came to the new World hardly ever met and mingled in Africa due to tribal differences and geography. In slavery these people of different ethnic groups did meet and marry and their offsprings carry mixed genes that had not existed before. Some of the ethnic groups had fierce warriors like the Mandinkas, Bambara, Dogon, Akan (Asante, Brong and Baoule), Fang, Hausa, Fulani, Bakongo, Tikar etc. It is the mixture of all of the genes of those very war like people that we see on our football fields, basketball courts, baseball diamonds, boxing rings and tracks and fields. To me it is that simple and that is why these athletes that descended from the slaves have shown time and time again that they are even better athletes than the Africans. The descendants of the slaves are a composite of about 15-20 different African ethnic groups. Moreover, the Africans are a really diverse people, so depending upon who mixes with whom; there will be different attributes, like sickle cell.

That is just my opinion.
 
Last edited:

YaThreadFloppedB!

The Patron Saint of Threads
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
14,140
Reputation
16,346
Daps
71,509
Reppin
The Bushes
@Roddy Right destroyed Jen the Dude.

Lenny worked her too...

Nayaa STFU :pacspit:
You over here trying to antagonizing people w/o adding to the discussion, and conveniently choosing trivial parts of their posts to shyt on instead of addressing their point.
If you went to a "good school" you'd know to cite your sources that back up your claim instead of getting defensive when people ask for the sources.
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,500
Reputation
9,578
Daps
105,115
Reppin
NULL
Yup, I've seen it. I'm glad you posted it. I've recommended it to everyone.

Interesting when she's reading that document about post-slavery discrmination against blacks....


"No free negro or MULATTO"

Guess that gives a lil insight as to how they really feel about " half breed" folk.


They consider them "niccraz"
 
Joined
May 30, 2014
Messages
27,277
Reputation
9,680
Daps
103,631
Reppin
Midwest/East Coast/Tx (Now in Canada)
Just like clock work
Light skin dudes always show their true colors during time like these man :skip:
Y'all show your true colors when you try to separate us and we're the same thing. You just look a lil more african...there is obvious native/cac interference. Does that make me better than you? No...Y'all won't be taking intraracial pot shots...especially when folks have race and ethnicity confused.
We are not purebreds, even you darkskinned/brown toned brehs are not.
We are something NEW.
Africans are 80s ferraris, we're the new ones. Get it? The improved model.
Heterosis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HYBRID VIGOR.
 

Retired Account

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
5,072
Reputation
490
Daps
21,455
Reppin
The Bronx
Y'all show your true colors when you try to separate us and we're the same thing. You just look a lil more african...there is obvious native/cac interference. Does that make me better than you? No...Y'all won't be taking intraracial pot shots...especially when folks have race and ethnicity confused.
We are not purebreds, even you darkskinned/brown toned brehs are not.
We are something NEW.
Africans are 80s ferraris, we're the new ones. Get it? The improved model.
Heterosis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HYBRID VIGOR.

fukk your superiority complex:camby:

You ol im part Cherokee ass nikka:childplease:
 

Knuckles Red

<3<3<3
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
8,458
Reputation
-7,777
Daps
29,921
The undertones in a lot of these comments are disturbing and pathetic. Its almost like some of you take pride with being the decedents of slaves chosen and bred by white slave masters. Like some of you feel like the "Chosen Ones." So pathetic, and sad. No I don't think slaves were bred like cattle. I think that is a myth.
 

Knuckles Red

<3<3<3
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
8,458
Reputation
-7,777
Daps
29,921
I didn't say they died because of slavery don't be a moron. I said native Americans weren't used for slaves because they were physically inferior. Ive done more research on this than you, don't try to out smart me.
LOL, you need to do a little more research. The number one reason why natives weren't as useful is because they were....NATIVES!!! They knew the land, they knew where to go, and where not to go. They could escape because they knew where to go. Also, nobody stuck out as much as africans with their unique features. That aided in slave masters keeping track of them.
 
Top