New York and Utah have diligent ways of trying to win deals. For now, it seems each side is waiting for the other to blink.
theathletic.com
This is a dope article. Paywalled, so I'll only include excerpts and descriptions to leave reason for yall to click.
Let's start with how much of a hardline Danny Ainge typically takes. This is the major concern with Utah...rumors have had Ainge casting aside good trades because they were slightly less than his asking price and then getting left with the bag or picks or whatever.
Enter Rose's team, it's cool to note the dynamics of the FO. Brock Aller takes the lead on trades but if other members of the FO are familiar with executives on the other side, those guys take the lead. Scott Perry was a big piece of the draft night deals which was reported prior ad re-confirmed here.
But more importantly, Brock Aller's obsession with the details is referenced.
The interview
@ISO posted already mentioned this, but the negotiations aren't focused on players or the number of picks. They're mostly haggling over which picks are going, with NY fighting to keep their unprotected picks and Utah saying no to the protected ones.
This is the big part for me...
This describes one way leverage imo. The Knicks can outbid any team with their back-up offer. Utah is hoping somebody comes up with a magic three-team trade to generate enough assets just to compet. That's real leverage. On Utah's side of the negotiation, they know NY wants a star....that's it. That's not leverage. But they'll run that line while Danny Ainge tries to wait out the game of chicken. Unfortunately, Ainge is such a stubborn dude that he might be willing try and keep Mitchell. But I don't think Aller's the type to get desperate and offer more...we'll see.