storyteller
Veteran
That's been 5 years ago and dudes still keep bringing up Mitchell's defense from college and his rookie season like he's still that same player in that aspect
It's those type of comments that are the reason why people clown Mitchell as they don't use those same talking points or excuses with other players who are trash defensively as well.
Brunson and Mitchell is obviously a tough fit defensively, but I have to think they've talked to Thibs about it. Thibs has schemed out great defenses to cover for undersized guards that were worse than Brunson or Mitchell defensively (ie: DJ Augustin). Don's actually a pretty capable defender though we have to go back to his college and rookie seasons to see the best evidence, so it's a reach I admit.
Anyway, I think the Knicks pushed to get Mitch done before he saw other offers because they planned to go small up top. Hartenstein is also an elite defender at the rim. So I'm expecting familiar drop coverage with the small guys going over screens and funneling ball handlers into the big men. I'm not sure how effective that will be, but it worked even with Kemba/Fournier on the perimeter. So I think it should at least be competent enough that the offense can win games.
But the defense questions are why I'm having a tough time deciding whether I prefer to keep IQ or Grimes in an eventual deal. Grimes has a bit more size and defense that could really help in a pinch.
Act like I literally didn't point out it's been years and mention that it's a reach
![stopitlsime :stopitslime: :stopitslime:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/stopitslime.png)