DC CANCELS bisexual superman after 18 issues as sales plummeted to just 34,000 last month

ThaBronxBully

Postin’ & Toastin’ Since 02’
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,195
Reputation
8,238
Daps
115,597
Reppin
NYC
full


You fukkking Guys Are A Trip lol
 

Kasper KArr

Go-getter from the Lower East Side
Bushed
Joined
Dec 17, 2014
Messages
3,925
Reputation
1,526
Daps
10,669
Are you that obsessed with me that you gonna go around tagging and quoting me in every thread?

If you a fakkit, why don’t you just say you a fakkit


laughing-weak.gif
Lmao mamaguevo yes or no is y’all nikkas on that side tight? Upset over the matter? Y’all nikkas turning on each other? SMH The fukkery 2023 gonna bring
 

ThirdAct

Superstar
Joined
Jun 15, 2017
Messages
8,359
Reputation
2,119
Daps
39,577
The blue check brigade who retweeted this shyt with the comment YAAAAAAS SLAY and all that other shyt probably didn't buy a single issue lol. Not too dissimilar to what Bill Burr was talking about with the WNBA.

The other thing is you make your agenda this heavy-handed of course it's gonna backfire. Comic book nerds wanna see Supes shoot lasers out his eyes, not lasers out of his dikk. :dame:
 
Last edited:

invincible1914

G.O.M.A.B.
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
14,986
Reputation
1,490
Daps
33,562
Reppin
LSU, Saints, Alcorn, VCU
They should've just made him gay. He's "bi" but all we see him doing chasing men. And he's constantly into gay social justice. Plus society is less accepting of bi men compared to bi women and/or gay men. They only made him bi to appease the alt right readers who didn't want a gay Superman.....it back fired because no on wants a bi Superman.:mjlol:
:wtf: But what would Lois Lane do


Why not just make an all new hero instead of offending Superman fans? Those DC Marvel folks are tribal. I remember the Authority doing pretty well back in the day and they basically had a gay Superman and a gay Batman in the group. Nobody was even offended. People are going to say homophobia, but it was really messing with an established character.
 

humminbird

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
44,909
Reputation
8,957
Daps
185,129
:wtf: But what would Lois Lane do


Why not just make an all new hero instead of offending Superman fans? Those DC Marvel folks are tribal. I remember the Authority doing pretty well back in the day and they basically had a gay Superman and a gay Batman in the group. Nobody was even offended. People are going to say homophobia, but it was really messing with an established character.
this is their son it's not clark kent
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,653
Reputation
13,909
Daps
299,776
Reppin
Toronto
This is the truth, but they keep doing it.
Because the gays are louder and more represented then they actually have numbers. They created a discrepancy in terms of public perception vs reality. Like another poster said most people wouldn't care if it was a character that happened to be gay vs a gay character. There's a subtle difference. They are too heavy handed with the shyt. Making dude a gay environmentalist sounds like they were hitting for all the liberal principles in an overbearing way. The pandering is too much.
 
Top