its some bogart pop art thats $2600 on ebayIt's just a white space breh. You want me to cop you some white? Wrong forum
its some bogart pop art thats $2600 on ebayIt's just a white space breh. You want me to cop you some white? Wrong forum
i guess i missed a lot of movies last year. ive got some downloading to do
Final list will be tallied on the 26h so you got til the 25thWhen does this end because I still have to catch up.
Like trying too watch Dawn for the 3rd time
When does this end because I still have to catch up.
Like trying too watch Dawn for the 3rd time
its some bogart pop art thats $2600 on ebay
i know thats why i put the .. ludicrous price.That's too rich for my blood breh. I'm thinking $20
Whiplash on everyone's list. Really? A movie about a drummer.
I didn't see Lucy so I can't speak for it but a child could've written better dialogue in the hobbit. Man..that movie. I'm still recovering
That type of movie is going to have childish dialogue, it's not some nuanced look at life. I don't think simple or childish dialogue should doom a movie, there is no one template for a good movie. Hobbit 3 had great visuals and a couple of fight scenes that were very exciting imo, and I enjoyed most of the movie.
Likewise with Lucy, "to knowledge" was really bad, but the rest of the movie was interesting enough that I liked it.
Film is a visual medium, dialogue only counts for so much IMO.
Idk man, the dialogue in the lord of the rings trilogy is pretty good. It's not great but it's a good level of writing that makes sense for the world it is and has to at least sound good and have a certain rhythm to it and fit the characters while also moving the drama along; it also has to feel honest. Good dialogue doesn't mean "nuanced look at life." Sorkin's forte has always been his dialogue and when he's firing on all cylinders, it's not about a nuanced look at life at all, far from it. But it fits the world of his movies, it fits characters, it informs the action and moves the action along and sounds believable coming out of those characters mouths. Jackson had no problem hitting that on the first three movies but couldn't for this last three
I wasn't saying good dialogue= nuanced look at life, just that The Hobbit movies are fairly childish and are going to have childish dialogue, childish dialogue won't be a nuanced look at life. Hobbit movies were a little cornier than LOTR and the dialogue reflected that to me. There was definetely a lot of goofy sh1t, but I was willing to overlook it for the great look of the movie and some good fight scenes.
On Interstellar... Introducing a villain and fight scene was goofy and unnecessary, really felt like they were doing it out of some obligation to keep reptilian minds interested in a big budget movie. I still liked it because the visuals were great and some of the ideas presented were interesting (like love having some kind of tangible component in the physical world we haven't identified yet.)
Whiplash on everyone's list. Really? A movie about a drummer.
did you see it breh?
Black Swan was about a dancer and it was one of the best films released that year; just like Whiplash is EASILY one of the best this year; Did you see Whiplash?