@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited, why do you condone slavery in the bible?

DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,840
Daps
88,730
Reppin
Houston
:sas1:

Not according to this book.......

41OihvwP3BL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




:sas2:


Probably written by Jews:sas2:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,660
Reputation
-34,224
Daps
615,838
Reppin
The Deep State
Where was it written?​
Doesn't motherfukking matter.

Cause if your suggestion is to change what the bible means, then you have to admit the bible is wrong.

Both can not be true.

The bible says one thing, and your SINGULAR book says another.


And we have less evidence of the treatment of SLAVES 2000+ years ago than we do today. You sound like one of those revisionist historians in the south arguing that the civil war wasn't about slavery
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
DonKnock said:
Probably written by Jews:sas2:

Don't know their religious affiliation (which doesn't even matter), but here's a list of contributors.......​

Gary Beckman
Professor of Hittite and Mesopotamian Studies
University of Michigan

Dr. Amalia Catagnoti
Dipartimento di Linguistica
University of Florence

Jerrold Cooper
Professor of Assyriology
Johns Hopkins University

Jesper Eidem
Associate Professor of Assyriology
Carsten Niebuhr Institute
University of Copenhagen

Tikva Frymer-Kensky
Professor of Hebrew Bible
University of Chicago

Richard Haase
Honorarprofessor für Keilschriftrechte
University of Tübingen

Richard Jasnow
Professor of Egyptology
Johns Hopkins University

Dr. Bertrand Lafont
Directeur de recherches
CNRS, Paris

Dr. Sophie Lafont
Directeur d’études
Section des sciences historiques et philologiques
École Pratique des Hautes Études

Joseph Manning
Associate Professor of Ancient History
Stanford University

Dr. Ignacio Márquez Rowe
Associate Researcher
Dept. Biblia y Oriente Antiguo
CSIC, Madrid

Joachim Oelsner
Professor emeritus
University of Leipzig

Simo Parpola
Professor of Assyriology
University of Helsinki

Bezalel Porten
Professor emeritus
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Dr. Karen Radner
Institut für Assyriologie und Hethitologie
Ludwig-Maximiliens-Universität, Munich

Dr. Kathryn Slanski
Kohut Post-doctoral Fellow
Yale University

Klaas Veenhof
Professor, Afdeling Oude Nabije Oosten
Leiden University

Raymond Westbrook
Professor of Ancient Law
Johns Hopkins University

Bruce Wells
Visiting Assistant Professor
Gustavus Adolphus College

Claus Wilcke
Professor emeritus
University of Leipzig

Dr. Cornelia Wunsch
Research Associate
University of Tübingen

Carlo Zaccagnini
Professor of Ancient Near Eastern History
University of Naples
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,031
Reputation
8,069
Daps
120,240
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
You seem to think owning people is OK

You keep using terms without understanding their proper usage in-context. Here's some help clearing up your issue.....
4.5.3.2 Family

Native terminology did not distinguish between “master” and “owner”; a husband was sometimes called the “owner” of his wife (and a king the “owner” of his subjects). Indeed, many of a husband’s powers over his wife and children overlapped with ownership: he could sell them into slavery (but apparently only under economic duress), pledge them for debt, and discipline them. Nonetheless, a wife or son sold into slavery retained their original status and received some protection from it. Apart from this extreme case, a wife could own property independently (including slaves), and a son had a vested right to inherit his father’s estate that could only be taken away for cause.

:popcorn:
 
Top