Curry is on track to surpass MJ, better than Lebron.

Bboystyle

Bang Bang Packers gang!
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,718
Reputation
-1,781
Daps
73,428
Reppin
So. Cal
We can talk about stats but that at the end of the day, it's ultimately winning is the most important part of that GOAT formula. Is Lebron a more complete player? Yes. Is lebron more athletically gifted? of course, but really...who cares if you don't dominate and impose your will on the league? Curry changed the league by playing nothing like MJ, which is a testament to how unique of a player he is. If he can secure another ring or two, he'll be looked at as the undisputed GOAT. Hell, you can make the argument now. He's been more successful in a shorter period and he still has good years left. Lebron had his time and his window appears to be closing. Lebron had to change his playstyle to compete with Curry. Curry ain't change the way he play to be more like Lebron, because he doesn't need to to beat Lebron. It's Curry's league. Lebron is chasing Curry and MJ. Curry ain't chasing no Lebron no more.

Lebron legacy is that he won't surpass MJ, but I think Curry is on track to surpass MJ as a better all-time winner.
To put things in perspective

As a player (all around)

Lebron >= Jordan >>> Curry

As a winner

Curry > Jordan >>> Lebron


How the fukk is a guy with 4 rings considered more of a winner than someone with 6?

You stans are lames
 

Osmosis

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
20,326
Reputation
2,811
Daps
54,461
Yes, but Isiah Thomas was nowhere near Jordan as an individual player.

That is the difference.
Yeah, because a guy named Kevin Durant wasn’t on Curry’s team for most of his wins against Bron :mjlol:

Steph made both Javale Mcgee and Andrew wiggins champions. GOAT
Bron made JR Smith and Iman Shumpert champs :wow:
 

Dwight Howard

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
20,620
Reputation
-3,505
Daps
58,019
Reppin
NULL
Wiggins made the all-star team because Kawhi and PG were injured. If he was a legit all-star, more teams would have tried to get him 2 years ago

The warriors beating the grizzlies doesnt mean their roster is stacked.
Dallas traded porzingis for bertans and Spender Dinwiddie (who were healthy). Why the fukk would "no porzingis" be a factor. And Tim Hardaway was having an AWFUL season before he got injured. He was a bad defender and before he got injured, he was shooting the ball like shyt

so wtf are you talking about, really?

Steph's presence makes the team better, and makes them more impactful when he shares the court with them. That is why the team looks stacked. You saw what Durant, Klay, and Draymond looked like when they didnt have steph in that stretch in the 2018-19 season. They went sub-.500 in the games step³h didnt play.

And this is why Steph is better than KD.
Steph could've proven he was better than kd when they were on the same team. Instead, we all saw kd win two finals mvps and play the best when it mattered most. :umad:
 

#1 pick

The Smart Negroes
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
76,846
Reputation
11,236
Daps
198,013
Reppin
Lamb of God
Wiggins was considered one of the worst all-star starters in recent memory, and only got in because Kawhi missed the whole year and PG played like 25 games before the all star break. He's great defender, and gives you 17 a game..
Nothing less, but nothing more.

Klay took time getting back into the groove of things post injury and missed like half the season

Poole was inconsistent for much of the year and only got hot at the end of the season. Even in the playoffs, he would disappear at timed and play bad defense.

Draymond is Draymond. Great defender, but would not be able to start on most teams without a player like Curry that draws so much attention AND runs around, giving Draymond easy passing opportunities.

Don't even gotta bring up GP2.

Bro, my fukking team played them in the finals. Draymond looked TERRIBLE for the half series, and had to get benched at the end of game 4. That's with him being as good as he is defensively. Klay was a mess, had like 2 good games.

There's a REASON Grant Williams said we were the better team. Because roster wise we were more talented.

The difference is that Curry played well, and the team plays cohesively with Curry and becomes better than the sum of their parts with Curry's shooting and gravity.

Calling this Warriors team stacked is silly. Very few had them going to theFinals. Heck, I was high on them, but even I had my doubts.

After game 1 I thought it was a wrap :russ:


:mjcry:
Is this nikka trying to argue and say the Warriors don't have a squad?
 

KidJSoul

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
18,056
Reputation
3,307
Daps
78,799
Steph could've proven he was better than kd when they were on the same team. Instead, we all saw kd win two finals mvps and play the best when it mattered most. :umad:
He beat him head to head in their lone playoff matchup, and has 2 more rings than him and won 2x without him

All the finals mvp proves is that KD put up better numbers in that lone series. That holds less weight :manny:
Is this nikka trying to argue and say the Warriors don't have a squad?
They have a decent squad. It really isn't that great, they rely a lot on Curry
 
Top